The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bisutti.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Original image appears here: http://www.actors-network.com/html/new/img/featured/hack-celebs.jpg Unable to verify copyright info, user has uploaded at least two other clear copyvio image, no reason to believe the license is valid for this. Mosmof (talk) 01:13, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- The user uploaded File:Chris_Bosh_All-Star_Game_2009.jpg claiming s/he took it -- yet that photo is found here and is attributed to photographer Bill Baptist. User uploaded File:AllisonMathis.jpg claiming s/he took it -- yet it is found here attributed to news photographer Stan Beha. Because of these previous deceptions, all uploads by this user are suspect and cannot be trusted. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 02:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Although a Google search did not reveal this image at another source, this celebrity would be unlikely to hold still for a photo while hugging someone. It appears cropped from an original. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE _{GOOD WORKS} 19:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Systel Inc twin server.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: there is no evidence the uploader has permission to use the image which he claims to be the author of and also claims to be the source, even though a source url was added in the description field, that source http://systelusa.com/eirm-ipc4116.html clearly claims copyright and there is no apparent connection between the source and the uploader. The uploader's copyright appear to be false. ww2censor (talk) 02:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this image located on the Systel website clearly indicates a copyright violation. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE _{GOOD WORKS} 18:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadion jaga.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 02:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• A Google search revealed no other versions of this photo. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE _{GOOD WORKS} 18:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Med gallery 10361 7 69098.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is unlikely to be the uploader's own work since they have uploaded other copyrighted works from other websites and the file's title suggests it was taken from a web gallery. Bidgee (talk) 10:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • File found and has been listed as a copyvio. Bidgee (talk) 10:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: licensed changed to non-free Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DorothyPound.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image was published in 1970. United States does not use date of author death (pma) as a copyright term determinant for published works [1] (note US term for unpublished works is 70 years pma, not 50, and publication occurred before 70 years had past since authors death in 1936). The publication had a copyright notice. Эlcobbola _talk 15:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Request using the image in the article Dorothy Shakespear with Fair Use Rationale. Thanks. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 00:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously doubt that the uploader is the organiation Mint (newspaper) who own this image or that they would release it into the public domain. --Cameron Scott (talk) 20:07, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google Streetview Car 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• http://twitpic.com/1mrb7l/full ©2010 Twitpic Inc, All Rights Reserved MGA73 (talk) 21:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PayPal Keycard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• clearly a derivative image of a paypal card and the website, both copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Image has been replaced with an appropriately licensed image of the actual product. Nate • (chatter) 20:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you need permission to delete it? --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE _{GOOD WORKS} 18:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.