The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:5G Nano iPod.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader states he/she was "using a promotional image" as a template. As Apple are copyright freaks, I doubt the promo image was freely licensed and this is a derivative of a copyrighted work, unless the copyrighted portion is extremely small. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Doors in Copenhagen 1968.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source clearly indicates it is a copyrighted file[1]. The Danish website even sells the image, and it is virtually impossible this is public domain in the U.S. The source further indicates: "... you may not use the material commercially, and you may not transmit digital copies to friends and acquaintances or other people outside your household or spread material in multiple copies for multiple users." There is no evidence of permission for its use from the copyright holder, and the image does not belong as "free" on the Commons. Doc talk 05:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TB LRT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader with a history of difficulty with correct licensing, perhaps indicating confusion in choosing license. Regardless, Flick doesn't have GFDL as a license to choose, and the image has a copyright watermark in lower righthand side. Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunkist 24 Pack & Cans.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of File:Sunkist box.jpg, which features the copyrighted logo so prominently that it is in itself a derivative work of the copyrighted logo and brand identity (so much so that the image was previously used as the logo in a previous edit of the article). The source image has also been moved to Commons and is listed for deletion there for the same reason. Curiously, the uploader of the image tagged the Commons image for deletion, so I don't know what's up with that. Mosmof (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunkist box.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. Please see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 December 7#File:Sunkist 24 Pack & Cans.jpg and commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sunkist box.jpg. Mosmof (talk) 17:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fanta 24 Can Pack.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. Copy of the file has already been deleted from Commons per request of the uploader. Mosmof (talk) 18:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.