The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feelings' - A*Teens.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like invalid copyright statement - It looks like an album cover (?) or at least a professionally-produced image, and so I have to doubt that the editor is the copyright holder Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• A Teens - Feelings shows up on RapidShare. Surely unfree. --Gert7 (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Die ABBA Revival Show.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like invalid copyright statement - It looks like an album cover or poster, or at least a professionally-produced image, and so I have to doubt that the editor is the copyright holder Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree hardly likely to the work of the uploader appears to be an album cover [1] and the same base image is used in a different montage on the groups website. MilborneOne (talk) 20:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Komando SAT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: Image has copyright notice and tineye finds many copies online, so it looks like the uploader's licence claim is false. ww2censor (talk) 13:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altai Tank(Çizim 2) 6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Re File:Komando SAT.jpg, photo has someone's name on it, so I suspect the uploader's claim to be the copyright holder might be false Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: identical image on an uploaded brochure page but in lower resolution is found at http://www.network54.com/Forum/248068/thread/1255163640/last-1256311402/Germany+offers+Greece+160+Leopard+A4s+to+resolve+lingering+problems ww2censor (talk) 14:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altai Tank(Çizim 2) 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As per doubts about this editor's other uploaded files, I think we need to question the reliability of the self-copyright claim Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: identical image on an uploaded brochure page but in lower resolution is found at http://www.network54.com/Forum/248068/thread/1255163640/last-1256311402/Germany+offers+Greece+160+Leopard+A4s+to+resolve+lingering+problems ww2censor (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altai Tank(Çizim 2) 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As per doubts about this editor's other uploaded files, I think we need to question the reliability of the self-copyright claim Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: virtually identical image but in lower resolution is found at (spam blocked site - www.army-guide.com/eng/product4347.html) ww2censor (talk) 14:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Türk Tüfeği.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As per doubts about this editor's other uploaded files, I think we need to question the reliability of the self-copyright claim Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mehmetcik1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As per doubts about this editor's other uploaded files, I think we need to question the reliability of the self-copyright claim Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mehmetcik 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As per doubts about this editor's other uploaded files, I think we need to question the reliability of the self-copyright claim Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:55, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bellomo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is no evidence that this is an FBI mugshot as claimed by User:Ted87, originally uploaded as non-free VernoWhitney (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Feel free to consider this withdrawn, given the clearer pictures provided by Ted87. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are 2 ways you can tell this is an FBI image:

1. He was arrested by the FBI, indicted and tried in federal court, and served his time in federal prison.
2. Although this image is hard to see, in these versions of the image: [2], [3] it clearly says "FBI New York" on them.

--Ted87 (talk) 18:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, I can't imagine why "FBI New York" would appear in the photo if it weren't produced by the FBI. This text appears in the black rectangle on the right side of the photo, around Bellomo's waistline. Nyttend (talk) 13:27, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Clearly an FBI mugshot. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheBoilermaker-History.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of creative caption on a statue. No indication that the text is not copyrighted VernoWhitney (talk) 17:58, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Effigi2BurningFlipside2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyrighted statue/artwork protected by US Freedom of Panorama law per commons:COM:FOP#United States. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BFMonkey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyrighted statue/artwork protected by US Freedom of Panorama law per commons:COM:FOP#United States. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note, the uploader has indicated that they hold the copyright to the sculpture, I imagine they should go through OTRS so I've directed them to WP:DCM. If this is incorrect or inadequate, I'd appreciate it if someone with more experience would clarify for me. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:06, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BFRocket.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyrighted statue/artwork protected by US Freedom of Panorama law per commons:COM:FOP#United States VernoWhitney (talk) 19:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note, the uploader has indicated that they hold the copyright to the sculpture, I imagine they should go through OTRS so I've directed them to WP:DCM. If this is incorrect or inadequate, I'd appreciate it if someone with more experience would clarify for me. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:06, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCN0225.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work from a copyrighted book. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.