The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bridgewater State College.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be taken from live webcam. Says captured, implying that he has screencapped the source of this image. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 02:01, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kosi Nepal Breach.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as ((cc-by-3.0)), but source page [1] says at the bottom "© UNOSAT, 2010" and makes no mention of a Creative Commons license. Uploader says on image description page, "The work is a free image. Kindly help me to identify the type of license, the image can be grouped into." —Bkell (talk) 03:11, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darin strauss author photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "fair use" != "public domain". This is a contradictory license; without further clarification from uploader, we cannot assume it is PD. See commons image as well. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lunatic cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Album cover, doubt uploader is the copyright holder. Acather96 (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. If the painting is freely licensed, please follow through WP:OTRS, who will restore the file if confirmed. — ξ^xplicit 04:29, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maharaja ganga Singh and Gang canal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Painting that I doubt is licensed under cc-by-sa Acather96 (talk) 09:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This file is not under copyright.I have uploaded this image after total enquiries.Trust has allowed me to upload this photo.any doubt visit Www.Maharajaganagasinghjitrust.Org or call +911512522464.this is phone no.Of trustees.After clearing doubt plz plz delete such tags. Shemaroo (talk) 11:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• You need to send a consent form to permissions-enwikimedia.org. Stifle (talk) 09:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep - wrong forum. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tamil-endhiran.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is an album cover, not a poster, and requires a detailed FUR. ((Album cover fur)) is an appropriate template for a FUR. Fæ (talk) 12:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep - wrong forum. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telugu-robo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is an album cover, not a poster and a FUR is not appropriate as File:Tamil-endhiran.jpg is already used for the relevant article. Fæ (talk) 12:20, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - no prejudice to recreation if better sourcing given. Image was borderline on the threshold of originality regardless, but deleting anyway as it's unused. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battle of Bias Bay 1849.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused photo of painting. Taking a photo of a painting dose not release the copyright of the painting itself. Since there is no information supplied as author painting itself it's copyright status is unknown, so it needs to be deleted --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:101cardtricks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused image of Book cover. Copyright is probably held by publisher not uploader. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I've left a message for Chris G, who restored the file recently. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hirakud.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• According to Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags/All#Stamps_and_currency and ((Non-free stamp of India)) the copyright for all stamps after 1948 is held by 'India Post'. This is from the 1970's. It could be fair-use. However this image is only used to illustrate the Hirakud Dam and ((Non-free stamp of India)) says that image may be used only "to illustrate the stamp in question (as opposed to things appearing in the stamp's design)", so I don't know if this is allowed.--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JARROW 1898.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Jarrow Portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unless uploader took these image himself in 1898 and before 1959 then ((PD-self)) is incorrect. However, this images may be PD for other reasons. but not enough information is given. File:JARROW 1898.pdf may be free due to age, however, unless date of publication or the authors date of death is know, the rule is 120 from creation or before 1890.See 17 USC 302. File:Jarrow Portrait.jpg may be free for publication reasons. However, the uploader seems to have created his account just to upload this image, so I doubt he will supply this needed information.--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WilmaRudolphFOEAward.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Obviously not the author of the work. Secret ^account 19:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, false license claim. Infrogmation (talk) 22:26, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, even the uploader claims that it is from the photo archive of the Fraternal Order of Eagles, and not of his own possession. hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 03:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - no comment from uploader on status of copyright holder for two weeks. We cannot verify it is anonymous or anything else at this point. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frederick Edmund Meredith.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I see no evidence that Rkipling took or owns the copyright to this image. Since it had to be taken before September 23, 1941 it is more then likely an unknown author and unpublished, meaning the image needs to be 120 years old. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:25, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1717shirtlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a logo so we may need a permission to use this file. Same with other version File:DPEA Logo.png. MGA73 (talk) 21:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DPEA Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a logo so we may need a permission to use this file. Same with File:1717shirtlogo.jpg mentioned just above. MGA73 (talk) 21:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contact information@dpengineering.org. The uploader released the image as free; because his edit history indicates that he is closely associated with the Dos Pueblos Engineering Academy, this may well be a valid release of copyright. hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 02:14, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Permission should be sent through to permissions-enwikimedia.org for the avoidance of doubt. Stifle (talk) 09:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.