The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rent Greek Cats seaso 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Highly suspicious that this own work claim is legitimate, being that the uploader has four uploads and at least two are blatantly false own work claims (title card and 2012 cast). There's also JPEG damage and metadata that looks suspiciously like a scanner, not a camera. All and all, I think this is bogus. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chobots Agent.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• With other upload of user. No evidence of permission, as can be seen on the website Chobots.net © 2011-2012 All rights reserved Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:10, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Erm, I say keep because I have played Chobots before and they allow these files to be on Wikipedia. --J (t) 03:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• That in and of itself is not a free license. We need a clear statement that it can be used under a free license. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 July 11#File:Penelope Umbrico- Art in America.png, wrong venue. — ξ^xplicit 00:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penelope Umbrico- Art in America.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Does not meet guidelines - this does not include anything about Penelope. J (t) 03:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ali Saleem cross-dressed as Begum Nawazish Ali.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Screenshot from a TV show, no evidence of release from producer —SpacemanSpiff 10:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keepSkier Dude (talk) 02:17, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural for Trans Caribbean Airways in San Juan Puerto Rico.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It's a mural = 2D artwork. Some one created this mural, we need permission.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:44, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a picture taken by me of part of a building and public sidewalk taken on a specific day that shows part of a mural now in ruins and partially obscured by a fence, that is talked about in an article about an airline that no longer exists. The men who put up the tiles may not even be alive today. How do you expect me to respond? When the airlines was running the mural played a role as an ad for transportation service and a landmark in the city. The picture illustrates what the article talks about, that is all. I would suggest adding more information in the article but not deleting the image. What do you want me to do? Arsdelicata (talk) 23:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably a work for hire, so the copyright holder is presumably the mural designer's employer, and so you need to obtain permission from the employer. If installed before 1978, the copyright expires 95 years after installation. If installed in 1978 or later, the copyright expires 120 years after creation of the mural. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logos usually fall under trademark, but unless someone buys the rights to it, (since the company is gone) why would you remove an image that illustrates a location and part of aviation history. The image does not take credit for having created the mural, sidewalk, sky or anything in it. It does not abuse any authors, but rather captures a scene at one moment in time in order to illustrate the topic of an article. Arsdelicata (talk) 02:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trans Caribbean Airways started in 1945 and disappeared in 1971. Where do you go to find out what year a mural was placed on a wall? Arsdelicata (talk) 05:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep What you wrote above makes me think that the mural is in the public domain.

If the company disappeared in 1971, then the mural was most likely installed before 1978. Can you find a copyright notice somewhere on the mural? If not, the mural is in the public domain. And who paints a copyright notice on a mural? I've looked at the full-size image and can't find any copyright notice, so I would guess that there is no notice. It could have been placed on the back side of the mural, but that side probably belonged to the airline's neighbour who wouldn't have wanted a copyright notice on its side of the mural.

If the mural was installed before 1964, the copyright would have to be renewed 28 years after the mural was installed, which sounds unlikely considering that the company existed for less than 28 years: the renewal would have had to be made after the company went defunct. Murals are not the kind of things you'd expect to be renewals for anyway. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ToastedRavioli cheese beef.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:ToastedRavioli cheese beef.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:35, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.