The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep all - 3 marked as ((FoP-USonly)) under an abundance of caution, although frankly they are probably not eligible for copyright (not enough building as artwork in the photos). 1 is certainly not eligible so I didn't mark it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philippine Railways LRT Central Station.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Philippine Railways PNR Ligao Station.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Philippine Railways PNR Biñan Station.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Philippine Railways MRT North Avenue Station.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No Freedom of panorama in the Philippines. It might be suitable for ((FoP-USonly))  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:56, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hirambinghamivstamp.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hirambinghamivstamp.png Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zellerhs1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a studio shot. No evidence the uploader owns the copyright. Eeekster (talk) 03:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1925circa-Dog Derby Ski Jump-Wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 1925 Date is not automatically PD, Without a further source impossible to determine status. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:US-MO-Kansas City-Downtown.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Duplicate had -

http://www.kcmo.org/planning.nsf/plnpres/FutLandUseMaps_18AreaPlans?opendocument as possible source, which makes the self claim shaky. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep all, OTRS received. — ξ^xplicit 00:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paintings by Antonio Diego Voci (1920-1985) or photos related to him, claimed to be own works by the uploader. Dubious own work, no evidence of permission.

Stefan2 (talk) 12:30, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The user claims to have some kind of permission from Helga Voci. I've asked the person to contact OTRS. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:56, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The uploader has since uploaded a few more paintings by the same artist. The same issue does of course also apply to those paintings. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I add the following images to the nomination because these images have the same problem:

• Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 13:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I didn't bother to update the gallery but just wrote that it also applies to later uploads by the same user. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Ahjkl67435 09:10, 21 June 2012

I have emailed OTRS and have the following letter from Helga Voci (copyright holder for all images you have tagged as suspicious): http://imgur.com/a/jHpPd. I would appreciate it if you would take these images off this list. Thank you.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RockinJohnnyslogo2links.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is the ((PD-textlogo)) claim really accurate? I see textures similar to those in Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:BF-Schriftzug.png. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: The file was moved from File:RockinJohnnyslogo2links.png to File:Rockin Johnnys logo.png by Dipankan001 (talk · contribs) at 15:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC). AnomieBOT⚡ 17:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clarion Alley Mural Project, Mission District.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama in the United States. See Commons:COM:FOP#United States. Stefan2 (talk) 21:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opera 12 running on Windows 7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The purpose of this screenshot appears to be Opera, not the Wikipedia page. Thus, I fail to see how Opera could count as de minimis. Opera is not free software, so this seems to be a copyright violation. Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is okay, you can remove it. I had no idea what I was doing and I should have used the Sandbox to play around with. I found out about the sandbox after I already screwed everything up. I apologize for the mess I left on the Opera Browser page. David — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dagroves (talk • contribs) 21:39, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LawrenceClarkeHurdles.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a TV screenshot. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The uploader owns the right to the image due to personal ownership of the video that the video still is taken of. The video has also been uploaded to other media, without copyright limitations. Ownership can be proven at www.clsclarke.com/videos.(User talk:CLSClarke 08:16 (GMT)
  • Was the video a work for hire? Was copyright assigned or transferred to you by the copyright owner? Because it isn't your own work considering that you couldn't possibly be in two places at once: both the person making the video and the person leaping over things in the video. Uncle G (talk) 16:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • The video was not a work for hire, it was taken by a family member on my camera, for me. (User talk:CLSClarke 13.30, 21 June 2012 (GMT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.107.174 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SirOrmeBiglandClarkeBaronet.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader claims to have permission. If permission has been given, please follow the instructions at WP:CONSENT. The photo shows a man who was born in India and later lived in the United Kingdom, so the source country is either the UK or India. Apparently taken during WWI. India has a copyright term of publication+60 years for photos. The United Kingdom has a copyright term of life+70 years for WWI photos. In the United States, WWI photos are no longer copyrighted if they were published during WWI, but there is no evidence of publication — unpublished photos are copyrighted for life+70 years. The photo might be in the public domain, but it looks as if it might be a personal photo, so it is possible that it hasn't been published. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • What the uploader is claiming is that he is Lawrence Somerset Clarke and that this photograph of his great grandfather is in his family archive. Uncle G (talk) 16:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is the case. I own the image in the print and am the only member of the Clarke Family with this image as I hold ownership of the Clarke Family Archives. (User talk:CLSClarke 13.32, 21 June 2012 (GMT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.107.174 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.