< June 19	June 21 >

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shengjin Komuna Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Although this file is not used in any articles, it appears to be some kind of seal for an Albanian town (Shëngjin) - in which case, the uploader is unlikely to be the true copyright holder. Super Mario Man 00:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep... but uploader on notice of a block for a username too closely associated with a band. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cd artwork for Wickedkick's Kill To Live EP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image of a CD includes stylised text and a cover photo, to which the uploader is unlikely to own the copyright. Super Mario Man 00:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This cover artwork is completely owned by the artist.Photo takin by a paid photographer in front of an old ww2 canon in Brantford Ont Canada.The font used is not a standard font it is original.

This is obviously completely my own work.Band pictures and thats the disk to be released this week.Why there is a dispute makes no sense at all really — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wickedkick (talk • contribs) 01:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BHBKCharacters.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Collage of Indian TV actors. Violates WP:NFCC#1. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaz-yahoo-news.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Screenshot. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is simply a screen shot on my user page, which isn't distributed as part of Wikipedia. It fits within the standards for that area of the wiki. --Kaz (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfree file not used in the article namespace, see WP:NFCC#7 and WP:NFCC#9. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photograph of John Stephen Hill 2012.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is marked as being created in 2012 and owned by the uploader. The image does not seem to be of a 59 yr old man and the actual creation date is a far way in the past. Provenance appears unlikely Peripitus (Talk) 10:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who or what is the photo depicting? John Stephen Hill. Mr Hill has always looked much younger than his age, and the photo was taken seven years ago, hence the image does not look like a usual 59 year old - but it is the true image of John Stephen Hill at age 52.

Where was it taken? 10312 -121 Street, Edmonton AB CANADA T5N 1K6

On what date was it taken? 03/24/05

Who took the photo? Ed Ellis of Ellis Brothers Photography at the same above address,

Who is the license/copyright attributed to? Beta Fish is the owner. Ed Ellis affirms that he took the photo and Beta Fish is the sole owner of all rights,

In what article(s) would you like the photo to be placed? Wikipedia stub article about Canadian actor, John Stephen Hill

This use of this photograph has been authorized by John Stephen Hill

June 22, 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beta Fish (talk • contribs) 04:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PagcorCity-Animation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Considering the large amount of non-free images uploaded by the same person in the past, I am inclined to believe that this image is non-free, or at least falsely claimed as their own work. Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 10:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:In Consequence.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This showed up as an album cover? Flikr washing? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is highly unlikely that the Flickr owner is the copyright holder. Besides, this is listed under an unfree licence on Flickr. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Type O Negative September Sun Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Sourced to Google image search, this is an album cover, It's not self. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well using Google images is fine because I thought they're free. After I learned this image is possibly unfree, I change the source from Google to a particular website to free the image. I put September Sun under the album covers category like other singles, even though it is not an album. I used that category since I don't see any no other category relating to images of single cover. Maybe we should have singles cover category and somebody should create that one day and rename categories of every single covers. Planet Star 21:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence that the current 404 error website which is listed as source releases its images to the public domain, or that it even has permission to release this image to the public domain. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shengjin's City Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a duplicate of File:Shengjin Komuna Logo.png (listed above) and the concerns are the same - I doubt that the uploader holds the copyright to what is probably a copyrighted logo. Super Mario Man 19:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MQCampusInfoBoard.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:MQCampusInfoBoard.JPG. Stefan2 (talk) 19:24, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Don delillo nyc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Flickr lists this file as CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0. Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SDHunchakian emblem.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Also elsewhere on the Internet, e.g. here. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.