The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taryn Thomas Candid 2012 March.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Says "taken by a friend" which conflicts with the self-made claim in the license. No evidence of permission. Eeekster (talk) 00:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I am both the photographer and poster who uploaded the file. Picture taken by me at private home on March 15, 2012. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getsomemilk (talk • contribs) 01:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has a history of posting photos with inconsistent licenses. Changing them in response to warnings and notices by others. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:16, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tender Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Obviously not author's own work. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Close as keep and tag as missing permission - uploaded by someone with the same username as the film producer. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yorke.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• no source, appears to be an old map/diagram taken from a printed source - also not provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pearlscalegoldfish3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unclear from photo info if uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 05:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Issoria lathonia LoQ.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned, unclear if uploader is creator of source files for montage. Kelly ^hi! 07:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same is true for the other uploads. --Leyo 20:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Is there any particularly compelling reason to believe these individual images weren't self-taken? If I see a collage, and the uploader states it is his/her own work, my first instinct is to assume the uploader is telling the truth, unless there is some sort of evidence to the contrary (e.g., one of the images within is found elsewhere, or the uploader has a history of falsification). Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Images like this are generally deleted on Commons for lacking a source. Assuming good faith is nice and all, but the licensing for each individual image has to be verified. — ξ^xplicit 21:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete per Stefan2. The NPS often hosts images it does not own (see example from a similar project [1]). Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:11, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mission blue 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unable to verify original source/license. Kelly ^hi! 08:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is free - check the link at archive.org here Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 10:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • The archive link only proves that it was once hosted on a US government web site. No information about the photographer. Some US government web sites host images not made by the US government and those images are copyrighted. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - we'll need more information about the original author of these photos, and probably confirmation of this license from the inheritors that the given license is OK. To the uploader: if you want to see how to give confirmation, please ask at WP:MCQ. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madapati with Sarojini Pullareddy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "By Madapati Sucheta" implies the uploader is not the copyright holder. Eeekster (talk) 08:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madapati with Burgula Ramakrishna Rao.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "By Madapati Sucheta" implies the uploader is not the copyright holder. Eeekster (talk) 08:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tzvigalchen-7yearold.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. Leyo 13:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tzvigalchen-portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. Leyo 13:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tzvigalchen-army.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. Leyo 13:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - OTRS confirmation was insufficient, and no reply has been received to the return correspondence given about 6 days ago. Image can be undeleted if proper license is given. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanton population over time.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Taken from here. I'm assuming that a drawn chart is copyrighted in the UK and maybe also in the US. Replaceable by an own chart based on the same data. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I think this file should have been tagged as missing evidence of permission, not as a possibly unfree file. (Granted, the uploader asserted a fair use rationale and that the work was in the public domain at the same time.) Please note that an e-mail has been received at OTRS concerning this file and we have confirmed permission; we are now confirming licensing. — madman 13:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • There was no fair use rationale when I reported this, but never mind. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ah, fair enough. In any case, we have permission to use this file though it is not yet clear what license is associated with the file. I'll keep the file page updated. Cheers! — madman 15:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:German tank in Budapest, October 1944.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a derivative work using an incompatible licence (CC-BY-SA 3.0 Germany changed into CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported in the derivative work) and the attribution looks a bit different compared to the original. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It's a cropped version of File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-680-8282A-38A, Budapest, Panzer VI (Tiger II, Königstiger).jpg on the Commons, released by the German Federal Archive. If I added the wrong template, please fix it for me, rather than suggesting deletion. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 16:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I think that it only is the uploader who is authorised to change the licence for the crop, but I might be wrong since the changes might be below the threshold of originality. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The licence hasn't been changed. It was uploaded as cc-by-sa-3.0, and that's what it still is. The attribution is identical, and it links to both the original source and the Commons version. There is no issue here. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 16:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It has been changed from CC-BY-SA 3.0 Germany to CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:19, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per the discussion above, I've replaced the tag with ((cc-by-sa-3.0-de)). Gabbe (talk) 08:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Gabbe, that was the template I didn't know how to find. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 14:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Notice board at Castello a Mare.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work. Who is the author of the drawing? Leyo 21:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not, me, its a noticeboard at the Castello a Mare site - so, given, that they have no web site - I was assuming they would be delighted with the publicity kevin flude — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpflude (talk • contribs) 22:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for noticeboards in Italy. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VoicesOfIraq.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader stated: "Copyright holder is Voices of Freedom, LLC" Eeekster (talk) 23:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Close as keep and tag as missing permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:33, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.