The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep with addition of valid url for source. Diannaa (talk) 20:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dornenkroenung-Wildunger-Altar-Konrad-von-Soest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dornenkroenung-Wildunger-Altar-Konrad-von-Soest.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 20:17, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• It's from like 1422 ... copyright has long since expired. NE Ent 00:49, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• ((PD-art)) would apply if this was cropped to just the painting. January (talk) 11:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus to delete the image,; file is tagged as non-free, so PUF is the wrong venue. Diannaa (talk) 21:00, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Popcorn noise graph.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Was put up with speedy for "replaceable" - I'm not certain if that data can be generated today, bringing to PUF instead.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:35, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Looks like the output of an acoustic device. Should be easy to recreate. Not necessarily copyrightable, but it may depend on what sound it represents. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It represents the random trapping and release of charge carriers at thin film interfaces or at defect sites in bulk semiconductor crystal. Is that copyrightable? If it's "easy to recreate", please do so before deleting the image. — Omegatron (talk) 00:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.