The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Source identifies image appropriately. TLSuda (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammed Omar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is vague and useless. Which person in it is Mohammed Omar (Mullah Omar)? How can we be sure it is him? We all know that Mullah Omar has only one eye but the men in the image appear to have both eyes. Who made the video? BBC went to Afghanistan during Taliban days in 1996 and made this video? What is the relevancy about this image? Krzyhorse22 (talk) 22:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Regardless of the quality, it still has relevance to the article under sub-section "Leader of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan". If you see the source [1], it states between 30-36 seconds "Mullah Omar displayed the holy cloak of the Prophet Muhammad to the crowd", and has that individual in the screenshot holding up the cloak. How can we be sure? Because various eye witnesses, including the BBC NewsNight team who were actually there and recorded it, stated it. Numerous medial outlets [2], [3] have also commented on the event and its authenticity. How can you even tell from the image quality that the individual possessing the cloak has two eyes? I can only see two dark eye sockets, which anyone would have, even if they were missing an eye. Deleting an image based on assumptions isn't good enough when the facts are not in your favor. From the sounds of Krzyhorse22, it appears that this has nothing to do with a copyright violation, but more about a personal issue. StanTheMan87 (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• KrzyHorse22 has been fanatically and repeatedly nominating this file for deletion. Each of his nominations is accompanied by ANI reports about StanTheMan87. He has previously been reported as a possible single-purpose disruptive account after he declared he had telephoned the director of the CIA to discuss Wikipedia (see the diffs in the related ANI KrzyHorse filed today). This is a nuisance, non-serious, report and I ask it be closed by a patrolling admin. DocumentError (talk) 06:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.