(Please assess them on this assessment requests page, instead of assessing it yourself.)
((Music Barnstar))
for Camper Van Beethoven at GA. For the other 3 articles, the Music Barnstar if you took it to DYK and the Original Barnstar if you had to create it first.What does "Expand the article 5 times" mean? I ask because it's probably too late to have the article at FA status by April 1 – not that I plan to work on this article. Tezero (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
User:Sven Manguard/XCOM
While the MfD for this page ended up being resolved in favor of keeping this page open, there was an overwhelming consensus that this specific post was not in line with community expectations. Therefore as part of the MfD close, I am closing this thread. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:55, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
|
---|
These three issues have been mashed into one, and a handful of people are really fired up and doing everything they can to maximize damage to the reputation of Suburban Express. "Tech Blogs", which seem to have a vested interest in fanning flames to earn clicks and generate attention, have also worked hard to exploit the situation. At this time, the Suburban Express article is chock full of inaccurate citations. By that, I mean that the article might say, "Suburban Express likes green eggs and ham" and cite Article A. But examination of Article A reveals that there is no such quote in Article A. Also, the article lacks balance. Much of the quoted material is negative, and the Suburban Express "side" of the story has been left out. For instance, there are "admissible" quotes which discuss the types of situations which lead to collection suits (ie passengers printing multiple copies of one ticket and thereby stealing rides), but these either do not appear in the article, or they are immediately removed -- leaving one side of the story. A $150 reward is offered for syncing up the article with the cited articles, by removing statements which are not supported by the cited articles or by removing citations, and defending the article against re-posting of bad citations for 60 days. A $150 reward is offered for restoring reasonable balance to the article and maintaining same for 60 days.
I want to reiterate that this reward is not being offered to swing this article beyond neutral and into our favor. This reward is being offered to correct numerous factual errors related to cited sources and move the article towards a more neutral state. Thank you.
|
((User:Sven Manguard/Killing Floor))
decltype
(talk)
About:
Rules:
Reward Split:
Judging
Intent to Participate
Request for Reward
The offer will now expire at the end of the year. -Reconsider | speak 05:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I should be able to see improvement of some kind. See WP SK Roads for style.
Reward offer has ended early.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)