Caillou Pettis

Caillou Pettis (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

17 March 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Serial spammer for non-notable child youtuber Caillou Pettis. WP:Walled garden articles to date include thrice-deleted Caillou Pettis, Aaron Bennett, The Pilot (Fancy Boys), itself a recreation of the twice speedy deleted Fancy Boys. Edits include this egregious attempt at promoting this kid on the Seinfeld main article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


An unknown creator of fan films, Caillou Pettis, has repeatedly had their page recreated a number of times by these editors who specifically have edited a small focus of articles, including Batman fan films, Seinfeld and Rhett and Link. After Caillou Pettis was speedy deleted more than once and subsequently salted, other naming conventions have thus far included Caillou Pettis (actor) and Caillou Pettis (director). The most recent offender is BatmanArkhamConroy, who first recreated the article with the "director" descriptor, then after it was deleted, recreated it with the unsalted name. This account's edits so far have predominantly been about creating new articles in which they could link their name. It's highly likely that the original editor, Nicholas Favel, is actually Caillou Pettis, as their intention has been for self-promotion, rather than constructively contributing to Wikipedia. DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 03:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

All the accounts except BatmanArkhamConroy are  Stale. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

06 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


SimplyBatman22 was created after FilmLover2016, but SimplyBatman22 seems to be the main account, with edits to different pages. The only edits done by FilmLover2016 are related to Caillou Pettis which is a page that has been recreated by SimplyBatman22, as evident in the page logs and his talk page even after an AFD discussion. Notice how the only vote for a keep is made by FilmLover2016. I am unsure of which accounts created the pages before the one he recreated in 2017. This current May 2018 rendition was created by SimplyBatman22 in the draft space, then moved by FilmLover2016 to the main space. Yeenosaurus (talk) 🍁 02:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:07, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

06 July 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


They're back! The Caillou Pettis page was recreated by RhettAndLinkFans, a new user with similar contributions as the previous socks, as a draft, then moved to the mainspace by BatmanArkhamConroy, who also happens to have created the Caillou Pettis page before twice or more (see talk page), of which I now remember tagging years back. BatmanArkhamConroy's edits are a bit more diverse, but also contain similar edits to pages such as Rhett and Link and of course Pettis. He has also defended the page in an AFD in a similar manner to previous sock SimplyBatman22 (talk · contribs) (similar username!). For the record, there are also other SPIs involving Pettis, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nicholas Favel/Archive, in which Filmlover2016 and BatmanArkhamConroy are listed as suspected SPs. Yeenosaurus (talk) 🍁 05:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Yeenosaurus (talk) 🍁 05:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk assistance requested: Please merge to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FilmLover2016.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

29 July 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Recreation of an article about Omnicrom, the same as yet unreleased Caillou Pettis film that I mentioned in the last discussion, after it was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omnicron. SeinfeldSaltyDischarge also has a longer edit history of Caillou Pettis promotionalism — including the creation (today) of the high school Caillou Pettis attended (with, of course, Caillou Pettis listed as a notable alumnus), and heavy participation in the 2016 round of Caillou Pettis and his Batman fan film and his self-created film studio. Even SSD's few undeleted edits still involved Caillou Pettis in some way, such as quoting his user-generated IMDb comments as film reviews and adding mentions of his Batman fan film to the articles about real Batman franchise films and adding Caillou Pettis to the requested articles list. I suspect we should probably check for other sleepers as well. Bearcat (talk) 16:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

The two accounts are  Confirmed to each other and  Inconclusive to the master.  Blocked without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:34, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

26 August 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Recreation of Draft:Caillou Pettis (Canadian filmmaker), again. Bearcat (talk) 19:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Courtesy ping علاء (and Ajraddatz since I don't know if the former is active here). Seems like this should be handled globally. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Locked. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 21:26, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. No need for action locally, we're not tagging socks in this case. @Bearcat: I'll leave it up to you whether or not to delete the draft. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:28, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ajraddatz: faster than me. Best --Alaa :)..! 21:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

31 August 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Admin-shopping to bypass the WP:AFC process, by asking to have Draft:Caillou Pettis (Canadian filmmaker) (of course) moved directly into articlespace without proper AFC review. The request admittedly backfired, as one of the requestees submitted it for proper AFC review instead of just moving it themselves — and it's already been rejected for the same reasons it got rejected or deleted all the other times, but the fact that the request was made at all is problematic in and of itself. Some of this editor's past socks have already graduated to globally-locked status, for the record — and this version's only other contribution to date, besides this draft and the talk page requests, is an already-deleted draft about Caillou Pettis's father, which made no other notability claim at all besides fatherhood. Bearcat (talk) 20:59, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@Sir Sputnik:  Done --Alaa :)..! 06:16, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

30 November 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

The most obvious quacking: Draft:Caillou Pettis and also CU blocked as FilmLover2016 on other wikis. Praxidicae (talk) 14:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 December 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Recreated their favorite, Caillou Pettis as TwistedFalcon plus a ton of overlap with past socks like Nicholas Favel Praxidicae (talk) 17:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also clearly using this previously cu blocked ip again. Praxidicae (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Blocked without tags. Primefac (talk) 18:27, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


30 December 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Same overlap as last sock, same userpage sans a few changes and xwiki spamming of Omnicron and more Caillou Pettis crap. Praxidicae (talk) 16:49, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

03 January 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

more crap, new name Praxidicae (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 January 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

More caillou pettis garbage plus standard overap and username. Praxidicae (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

16 April 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Caillou Pettis again. This time their tactic has been to spam a bunch of user talk pages with links to blogs and IMDb and the same Taylor Swift tweet coverage that wasn't enough the first eleventy squillion times, in an attempt to get somebody else to recreate a new article in lieu of trying to do it themselves. This, of course, also ties in with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Caillou Pettis and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nicholas Favel, which should probably all just be merged into one, but I'm choosing this puppetmaster name as it's the one that's been updated within the last few months with current socknames that might not be stale yet. Bearcat (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More