- Cyrinus (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Master is involved in heated AfD and other issues. Sock1 was created just moments ago and the only activity was to voice support on the Master's talk page. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 05:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- @Jsfouche - You took this as heated argument because you were pissed off, because I challenged what you posted in VAS page - which has wrong information. I have nothing to hide... You guys protested my old username Linuxtroll was not good and I retired it and put my real name Cyrinus... I have only one account... Nice try to defame me. Go and fix your VAS posting. Put a real definition for VAS (Vibroacoustic Stimulation), instead of posting fake sockpuppet alert and using a coward and cunning way to deal with the matter. There is no Master Salve... I am a security professional (read my profile on linkedin). My username is Cyrinus. Easy to verify IPs. Cyrinus (talk) 19:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I assure you, I was not pissed off. I have no sense of ownership of any article. What you did was violate multiple WP policies, and then you did not listen to other editors and continued. Your attitude of being confrontational and your unwillingness to accept WP policies and your name-calling do not serve you well. You can't just storm into WP and demand that your views are the only correct ones and repeatedly ignore all else. The investigation was opened because the activity looked suspicious. Plain and simple. And that is what an SPI is for. To look at suspicious editing and make sure it does not violate policies on sock puppetry and meat puppetry. If the investigation turns out to be unsubstantiated, then all the better. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 22:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Collaboration with my community to gather references and materials asked by wiki editors and admins. They all read the harassment going on in different notice boards. They all are irritated by your comments, name calling - especially yours. It is not meta puppetry. Google plus is our community and I am not a recruiter. Cyrinus (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Harassment - not notifying involved parties is a prove that this was done intentionally and the one who reported has vested interest on the VAS article - which was challenged by me. We do not tolerate harassment against our profession - VAT was used more than 30 years in scandinavian hospitals and clinics - and now practiced globally... major research centers in Ontario, Canada. Some claims are approved by FDA... Cyrinus (talk) 20:37, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This user is upset because the article he created has a conflict with the article I created. Vibroacoustic Therapy is based on Vibroacoustic Stimulation - on wiki the article he created is defining vibroacoustic stimulation as Fetal Vibroacoustic Stimulation - which is wrong. This is meta puppetry of some wiki editors/admins harassing a new user - stating so many different excuses to delete the topic vibroacoustic therapy. In the process they deleted other sound therapy modalities... I provided enough references - but they went ahead and deleted the topic... The same individual created this complaint without my knowledge - and now he is changing his tune again... so many excuses - even most of the content I posted was in compliant with wiki guidelines. Hope someone will investigate and take action without any bias. My article is now in sandbox - they can go and edit and remove - if they think those links are spam... I am not canvassing - I am trying to post a therapy form existed for more than 30 years as allied health profession globally. I posted many PubMed links too - FDA approved medical claims - many universities teach this up to doctors degree under music therapy (Finland and Canada) - so I do not think it is a fringe theory. This is pure vandalism against vibroacoustic therapy. Cyrinus (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If that google plus community is irritating you - I have removed it. You have a conflict of interest as a perinatal nurse, but your definition for VAS is wrong - people cannot trust wiki with that definition for VAS. You should change the VAS to Fetal Vibroacoustic Stimulation. Cyrinus (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
-