The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The Radio People (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant subset of ((Monroe Radio)). Created by banned sock User:Futurewiki, known for his overly extensive contributions to Louisiana broadcasting articles. Raymie (t • c) 22:57, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cenla Broadcasting (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant subset to ((Alexandria Radio)). Created by banned sock User:Futurewiki, known for his overly extensive contributions to Louisiana broadcasting articles. Raymie (t • c) 22:56, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Elite Radio Group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Owns just two stations. Created by banned sock User:Futurewiki, known for his overly extensive contributions to Louisiana broadcasting articles. Raymie (t • c) 22:55, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 07:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Contains Arabic text (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I would expect that most computers today would support this script, but I don't know how to verify for myself. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unnecessary. @LaundryPizza03: I would suggest also nominating the templates for scripts whose characters have Unicode code points before the CJK Unicode block (e.g. Coptic, Cyrillic, Armenian, Hebrew, Thai, Burmese); ((Contains Chinese text)) was deleted for being unnecessary in 2017, so I would expect those to be deleted for the same reason. Jc86035 (talk) 09:07, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  That would comprise a significant part of the Basic Multilingual Plane, U+0000..U+2E7F (11904 out of 65536 code points). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; it is not useful. Wadaad (talk) 20:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, not necessary. Frietjes (talk) 14:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete Do we have any data supporting what percentage of hits can display Arabic text? If it's 99%+ (which I think is likely), I'm in favor of it. Similarly for other scripts. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Warid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Three entries, all of them are defunct. Better to use 'see also' on the main page. Störm (talk) 14:29, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: doesn't seem like the navbox will be expanded given the company's defunct status; a couple of "see also" links on the articles should be enough to navigate. –Sonicwave ^talk 06:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Deletion already decided. by Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject PHP. There is no point having a template advertising a deleted WikiProject and the continuing presence of this template can only have been an oversight. kingboyk (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikiProject PHP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned banner. The parent project was deleted at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject PHP. ( would also include Category:WikiProject PHP articles.) —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 08:55, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete While it wasn't explicitly mentioned in the MfD it was definitely included implicitly. -- Trialpears (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jacob Yates and the Pearly Gate Lock Pickers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The band's navigational template consists of three links: the band's article, one album and a band article that should not be listed in the template. With only two links that already to each other making the navigational template unnecessary and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 03:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 14:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Trialpears (talk) 14:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 06:42, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The Gothenburg Address (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The band's navigational template consists of four links: the band's article and three band articles that should not be in the template. The band has no notable releases, the template is only located in the band's article, so it navigates nowhere and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 03:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 14:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Trialpears (talk) 14:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).