The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. kingboyk (talk) 22:57, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The Orange Lights (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The band's navigational template consists of five links: the band's, a non-notable member redirected to another band, a non-notable album redirected to the band and two bands that should not be included in the template. With only one article using the template, it navigates nowhere and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 20:20, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Navbox consists of only redirects and peripherally related topics. If the articles are recreated, please ping me. czar 16:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 14:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy G8: WP:Empty navbox. czar 16:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mesh-29 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This band's navigational template consists of one link: the band's. The template navigates nowhere and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 20:14, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 August 4. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infoshops (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Contains Cyrillic text (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The Cyrillic script is in widespread use and thus one can expect it to be well-supported. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; no longer useful. Jc86035 (talk) 06:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. kingboyk (talk) 22:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WelcomeLong (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has been used exactly once, on the talk page of a blocked sock account with no edits. It doesn't seem useful and it would probably be better to report such a user to WP:UAA. Jc86035 (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This should not be how we great any new user. If they want to be called "didjvrdjuxxjjdndjx" that's their choice. -- Trialpears (talk) 10:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm aware of WP:UNCONF, but that issue is better dealt with later instead of scaring away new editors as soon as they join the project. --Trialpears (talk) 20:56, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Best handled by a custom message with discretion, as I imagine would happen anyway since this template is not in wide circulation. czar 16:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Template:Uw-username or a custom message should be good enough for this purpose. –Sonicwave ^talk 06:44, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).