You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 54.163.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Blablubbs‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a colocation provider's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~)). You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 17:28, 10 March 2024.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by ‪Jon Kolbert‬. The reason given is Open proxy/Webhost: See the help page if you are affected .
- Start of block: 18:27, 12 November 2023
- Expiry of block: 18:27, 12 November 2028
Your current IP address is 54.163.179.242. The blocked range is 54.163.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

((More citations needed|date=March 2022))((Short description|Type of monopoly))((Competition law))
In [[economics]] and [[business ethics]], a '''coercive monopoly''' is a firm that is able to raise prices and make production decisions without the risk that [[competition]] will arise to draw away their customers.<ref name="polyconomics Antitrust">[[Alan Greenspan|Greenspan, Alan]], [http://www.polyconomics.com/searchbase/06-12-98.html ''Antitrust''] ((webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051217172640/http://www.polyconomics.com/searchbase/06-12-98.html |date=2005-12-17 )), in ''Capitalism:The Unknown Ideal'' by Ayn Rand. Also [http://www.nathanielbranden.com/catalog/articles_essays/question_of_monopolies.html ''The Question of Monopolies''] ((webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051024121108/http://www.nathanielbranden.com/catalog/articles_essays/question_of_monopolies.html |date=2005-10-24 )) by [[Nathaniel Branden]] defines and discusses coercive monopoly.</ref> A coercive monopoly is not merely a sole supplier of a particular kind of good or service (a [[monopoly]]), but it is a monopoly where there is no opportunity to compete with it through means such as price competition, technological or product innovation, or marketing; entry into the field is closed. As a coercive monopoly is securely shielded from the possibility of competition, it is able to make pricing and production decisions with the assurance that no competition will arise. It is a case of a [[contestable market|non-contestable market]]. A coercive monopoly has very few incentives to keep prices low and may deliberately [[price gouge]] consumers by curtailing production.<ref>[[Lawrence Kudlow|Kudlow, Lawrence]], [http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/kudlow061400.asp ''The Judicial Hacker''], in ''Jewish World Review'' (June 14, 2000)</ref>

Coercive monopolies can arise in free market or via [[government intervention]] to institute them.<ref name=Hasnas1998>((cite journal |last1=Hasnas |first1=John |title=The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed |journal=Business Ethics Quarterly |date=1998 |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=19–42 |doi=10.2307/3857520 |jstor=3857520 |s2cid=44030310 ))</ref><ref>((cite journal|first1=Robert|last1=Bejesky|first2=Orlando|last2=Valle|title=Consumer Welfare and the Sherman Antitrust Act: Reflecting on the Microsoft-Netscape Browser Competition|url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tmclr19&id=45&div=&collection=|journal=Thomas M. Cooley Law Review|date=2002|pages=37|volume=19))</ref><ref>((cite web|accessdate=2023-12-28|title=Ethical and legal considerations of reCAPTCHA|url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6297942|website=ieeexplore.ieee.org))</ref> Some conservative think tanks, such as the [[Foundation for Economic Education]], define coercive monopolies solely as those established by the government or via the illegal use of force, excluding monopolies that arise in the free market.<ref>((Cite web |last=Richman |first=Sheldon |date=2012-06-27 |title=Can Mutually Beneficial Exchanges Be Exploitative? ((!)) Sheldon Richman |url=https://fee.org/articles/can-mutually-beneficial-exchanges-be-exploitative/ |access-date=2022-03-09 |website=fee.org |language=en))</ref> 

==Contrasted with other monopolies==
((Unreferenced section|date=December 2023))
Exclusive control of electricity supply due to government-imposed "utility" status is a coercive monopoly because consumers have no choice but to pay the price that the monopolist demands. Consumers do not have an alternative to purchase electricity from a cheaper competitor, because the wires running into their homes belong to the monopolist.

Exclusive control of [[Coca-Cola]], by contrast, is not a coercive monopoly because consumers have other cola brands to choose from and the Coca-Cola company is subject to competitive forces. Consequently, there is an upper limit to which the company can raise its prices before profits begin to erode because of the presence of viable [[Substitute good|substitute goods]].

To maintain a ''non-coercive monopoly'', a monopolist must make pricing and production decisions knowing that, if prices are too high or quality is too low, competition may arise from another firm that can better serve the market. If the non-coercive monopoly is successful, it is called an ''efficiency monopoly'', because it has been able to keep production and supply costs lower than any other competitor so that it can charge a lower price than others and still be profitable. Since potential competitors are not able to be so efficient, they are not able to charge a lower or comparable price and still be profitable. Hence, competing against a non-coercive monopoly is possible but not profitable, whereas competing against a coercive monopoly is potentially profitable but not possible.

==Establishing a coercive monopoly==
According to business ethicist John Hasnas, "most [contemporary business ethicists] take for granted that a free market produces coercive monopolies."<ref name=Hasnas1998/> However, some people, including Alan Greenspan and Nathaniel Branden, argue that such independence from competitive forces "can be accomplished only by an act of government intervention, in the form of special regulations, subsidies, or franchises."<ref name="polyconomics Antitrust"/><ref>Branden, Nathaniel, [http://www.nathanielbranden.com/catalog/articles_essays/question_of_monopolies.html ''''The Question of Monopolies''] ((webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051024121108/http://www.nathanielbranden.com/catalog/articles_essays/question_of_monopolies.html |date=2005-10-24 )), from ''The Objectivist Newsletter'' (June 1962)</ref> Some point out that a coercive monopolist may "employ violence" to create or maintain a coercive monopoly.<ref name=Rothbard>[[Murray Rothbard|Rothbard, Murray]], [http://www.mises.org/rothbard/ethics/twentytwo.asp ''The State Versus Liberty''] in ''The Ethics of Liberty'' by Rothbard (1982)</ref>

Some((Who|date=March 2022)) recommend that government ''create'' coercive monopolies. For example, claims of [[natural monopoly]] are often used as justification for government intervening to establish a [[statutory monopoly]] ([[government monopoly]] or [[government-granted monopoly]]) where competition is outlawed, under the claim that multiple firms providing a good or service entails more collective costs to an economy than would be the case if a single firm provided that good or service. This has often been done with electricity, water, telecommunications, and mail delivery. Some economists((Who|date=March 2022)) believe that such coercive monopolies are beneficial because of greater [[economies of scale]] and because they are more likely to act in the [[national interest]]. Conversely, Judge [[Richard Posner]] famously argued in ''Natural Monopoly and Its Regulation'' that the [[deadweight loss]]es associated with regulating such monopolies were greater than any possible benefit.<ref>[[Richard Posner|Posner, Richard A.]] ''Natural Monopoly and Its Regulation''  (((ISBN|1-882577-81-7))).</ref>

==Private coercion==
A [[corporation]] which successfully engages in [[coercion]] to the extent that it eliminates the possibility of competition operates a coercive monopoly. A firm may use illegal or non-economic methods, such as [[extortion]], to achieve and retain a coercive monopoly position. A company which has become the sole supplier of a commodity through non-coercive means (such as by simply outcompeting all other firms) may theoretically then go on to become a coercive monopoly if it maintains its position by engaging in coercive [[barriers to entry]]. The most famous historical examples of this type of coercive monopoly began in 1920, when the [[Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution]] went into effect. This period, called [[Prohibition]], presented lucrative opportunities for [[organized crime]] to take over the importation ("[[rum-running|bootlegging]]"), manufacture, and distribution of alcoholic beverages. [[Al Capone]], one of the most famous [[bootleg liquor|bootleggers]], built his criminal empire largely on profits from illegal alcohol and effectively used coercion (including [[murder]]) to impose barriers to entry on his competitors. However, even private coercive monopolies almost invariably require government support, whether direct or indirect. In Capone's case, the U.S. government created the necessary conditions for a coercive monopoly by outlawing the manufacture and sale of alcohol, thereby enabling unnaturally high profits on the black market, and was not providing the usual service of enforcing trade contracts.((Citation needed|date=March 2022)) Likewise, some [[Political corruption|corrupt public officials]] took bribes that ensured that Capone would receive preferential treatment against potential competitors.<ref>((Cite book |last=Behr |first=Edward |title=Prohibition: Thirteen Years that Changed America |publisher=Arcade Publishing |year=1996 |isbn=9781559703567 |pages=189))</ref>

==Antitrust==
The ability of firms in a coercive monopoly to increase their profits through setting prices above competitive levels brings about the need for antitrust law. There are examples in history wherein a firm that is not a [[government-granted monopoly]] is claimed to have a coercive monopoly, and [[antitrust]] action has been initiated to resolve the perceived problem. For example, in ''[[United States v. Microsoft]]'' [http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/ms_index.htm] The Plaintiff's Finding of Fact alleged that Microsoft "coerced" [[Apple Computer]] to enter into contracts resulting in the prohibition of competition. ((ref|finding)) Eric Raymond, an author and one of the founders of the [[Open Source Initiative]], says "The thing a lot of people somehow missed is that the courts affirmed the findings of fact – that Microsoft is indeed a coercive monopoly."<ref>[http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,27574,00.html ''Silicon Valley, AOL TW React With Caution''] ((webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070514062319/http://www.thestandard.com/article/0%2C1902%2C27574%2C00.html |date=2007-05-14 )) in The Industry Standard, (June 28, 2001)</ref> 

Another disputed example is the case of ''U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America (Alcoa)'' in 1945. The court concluded that Alcoa "excluded competitors."<ref name="polyconomics Antitrust"/>  The ruling is heavily criticized for punishing efficiency and is quoted below:

<blockquote>It was not inevitable that it should always anticipate increases in the demand for ingot and be prepared to supply them. Nothing compelled it to keep doubling and redoubling its capacity before others entered the field. It insists that it never excluded competitors; but we can think of no more effective exclusion than progressively to embrace each new opportunity as it opened, and to face every newcomer with new capacity already geared into a great organization, having the advantage of experience, trade connections and the elite of personnel.<ref>''United States v. Alcoa'', [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/148/416/1503668/ 148 F.2d 416] (2d Cir. 1945)</ref></blockquote>

However, antitrust law varies across the United States and the European Union. Specifically, in the U.S. monopoly pricing is not regulated. Whereas the European Community (EC) considers excessive pricing as an abuse of dominance and those involved can be fined or subject to prohibitory orders.<ref>((cite journal |last1=Gal |first1=Michal S. |title=Monopoly Pricing as an Antitrust Offense in the U.S. and the EC: Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly? |journal=The Antitrust Bulletin |date=March 2004 |volume=49 |issue=1–2 |pages=343–384 |id=((ProQuest|201064375)) |doi=10.1177/0003603X0404900109 |ssrn=700863 |s2cid=55640455 ))</ref> This difference in regulation highlights the need to level out antitrust laws across the world in order to control this exclusionary and exploitive conduct in coercive monopolies. 

==Government monopolies==
Undisputed examples of coercive monopolies are those that are enforced by law. In a [[government monopoly]], an agency under the direct authority of the government itself holds the monopoly, and the coercive monopoly status is sustained by the enforcement of laws or regulations that ban competition, or reserve exclusive control over [[factors of production]] for the government. The state-owned [[petroleum]] companies that are common in oil-rich developing countries (such as [[Aramco]] in [[Saudi Arabia]] or [[PDVSA]] in [[Venezuela]]) are examples of government monopolies created through [[nationalization]] of resources and existing firms. 

The [[United States Postal Service]] is an example of a coercive monopoly created through laws that ban potential competitors such as [[United Parcel Service|UPS]] or [[FedEx]] from offering competing services (in this case, first-class and standard (formerly called "third-class") mail delivery).<ref>[[Lysander Spooner]] started the commercially successful [[American Letter Mail Company]] in order to compete with the United States Post Office by providing lower rates. He was successfully challenged by the U.S. government and exhausted his resources trying to defend his right to compete.</ref> Government monopolies also mandate taxpayers to subsidize these firms. Thus, if the government protection the United States Postal Service was lifted and mail delivery could be included in free competition, the number of entrants into the industry would likely increase.<ref>((cite journal |id=((ProQuest|815978228)) |last1=Simpson |first1=Brian P.|title=Two Theories of Monopoly and Competition: Implications and Applications |journal=The Journal of Applied Business and Economics |volume=11 |issue=2 |date=August 2010 |pages=139–151 ))</ref>

[[Government-granted monopoly|Government-granted monopolies]] often closely resemble government monopolies in many respects, but the two are distinguished by the decision-making structure of the monopolist. In a government monopoly, the holder of the monopoly is the government itself and the group of people who make business decisions is an agency under the government's direct authority. In a government-granted monopoly, the coercive monopoly is enforced through law, but the holder of the monopoly is formally a private [[corporation|firm]], or a subsidiary division of a private firm, which makes its own business decisions. Examples of [[government-granted monopolies]] include [[cable television]] and [[water]] providers in many municipalities in the [[United States]], exclusive petroleum exploration grants to companies such as [[Standard Oil]] in many countries, and historically, lucrative colonial "joint stock" companies such as the [[Dutch East India Company]], which were granted exclusive trading privileges with colonial possessions under [[mercantilist]] economic policy. [[Intellectual property]] such as copyrights and patents are government-granted monopolies.  Another example is the thirty-year government-granted monopoly that was granted to [[Robert Fulton]] by the State of New York in steamboat traffic, but was later ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court to be unconstitutional because of a conflicting inter-state grant to Thomas Gibbons by the federal Congress.<ref>For about six months, Thomas Gibbons and [[Cornelius Vanderbilt]] operated a steamboat with low fares in defiance of the law. Gibbons successfully took his case to the [[United States Supreme Court]]. The Court ruled in ''[[Gibbons v. Ogden]]'' that the state-granted monopoly, which conducted some service between New York and New Jersey, was an unconstitutional violation of interstate commerce. Fares immediately dropped from $7 to $3. [[Burton W. Folsom, Jr.|Folsom, Burton W.]] ''The Myth of the Robber Barons''. Young America, 2003.</ref>

Economist [[Lawrence Reed|Lawrence W. Reed]] says that a government can cause a coercive monopoly without explicitly banning competition by "simply [bestowing] privileges, immunities, or subsidies on one firm while imposing costly requirements on all others."<ref>((cite news |last1=Reed |first1=Lawrence W. |title=Witch-hunting For Robber Barons: The Standard Oil Story |url=https://fee.org/articles/witch-hunting-for-robber-barons-the-standard-oil-story/ |work=FEE |date=1 March 1980 ))</ref> For example, [[Alan Greenspan]], in his essay ''Antitrust'' argues that land subsidies to railroad companies in the western portion of the U.S. in 19th century created a coercive monopoly position. He says that "with the aid of the federal government, a segment of the railroad industry was able to "break free' from the competitive bounds which had prevailed in the East."((Citation needed|date=March 2022)) In addition, regulations may be established that place financial burdens on smaller firms that attempt to compete with larger, more established firms that are better able to absorb the regulatory costs.

==The state as a coercive monopoly==
Economist [[Murray Rothbard]], noted for his espousal of [[anarcho-capitalism]], argues that the state itself is a coercive monopoly as it uses force to establish "a compulsory monopoly over police and military services, the provision of law, judicial decision-making, the mint and the power to create money, unused land ('the public domain'), streets and highways, rivers and coastal waters, and the means of delivering mail."((Citation needed|date=March 2022)) He says that "a coercive monopolist tends to perform his service badly and inefficiently".((Citation needed|date=March 2022))  

These state-owned companies create an issue of setting unrealistic prices for unreliable services. An example of this was seen in Europe during the late 1980s when bank mergers decreased competition in the banking market. As a result, this coercive behaviour allowed them to sustain high interest rates until the early 90s, severely impacting their customers. <ref>Union of International Associations. (2019). State monopoly. State monopoly | The Encyclopedia of World Problems. Retrieved April 24, 2022, from http://encyclopedia.uia.org/en/problem/state-monopoly </ref> In addition to moral arguments over the use of force, [[free-market anarchism|free market anarchists]] often argue that if these services were open to competition that the market could supply them at a lower price and higher quality.((Citation needed|date=March 2022))

==Unions==
((See also|Union wage premium))
Labor unions have been called coercive monopolies which keep wage rates higher than they would otherwise be if individuals competed with each other for wages. Economists who believe this to be the case refer to this as a monopoly wage.<ref>((Cite book |last1=Heery |first1=Edmund |title=A Dictionary of Human Resources Management |last2=Noon |first2=Mike |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2002 |pages=225))</ref> This has raised some conversing opinions about the power of unions to contradict antitrust laws. Specifically, collusive methods to increases prices is illegal on public policy standards, but raising labour prices is encouraged.<ref>((cite journal |last1=Lindblom |first1=Charles E. |title=Are Labor Unions Monopolies |journal=Challenge |date=1958 |volume=6 |issue=5 |pages=26–31 |doi=10.1080/05775132.1958.11468630 |jstor=40717821 ))</ref> In addition, the unions participating in collective bargaining is applauded for its peaceful dispute settlement tactics, but this can also be seen as prohibited coercive behaviour. Nonetheless, as the intention behind these coercive actions in unions are for the benefit of workers rather than company profits, antitrust laws have not been held against these unions.

==See also==
*[[Non-contestable market]]
*[[Free market]]
*[[Government-granted monopoly]]
*[[Government monopoly]]
*[[Natural monopoly]]
*[[Regulatory capture]]
*[[Rent seeking]]

==Notes and references==
<references/>

==External links==
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20051024121108/http://www.nathanielbranden.com/catalog/articles_essays/question_of_monopolies.html ''The Question of Monopolies''] [[Nathaniel Branden]] defines and discusses coercive monopoly
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20070710191834/http://www.cei.org/pdf/1615.pdf ''Antitrust Policy As Corporate Welfare'' by Clyde Wayne Crews Jr] "Coercive monopoly power does not emerge from the transitory outcomes of the voluntary exchanges that comprise the marketplace. It is hoped that policymakers will come to recognize that government cannot protect the public from monopoly power, because it is the source of such power."
*[http://www.quebecoislibre.org/021221-15.htm ''Antitrust Laws Harm Consumers and Stifle Competition'' by Edward W. Younkins] "a coercive monopoly is closed entry that can only be achieved by an act of government intervention in the form of special regulations, subsidies, or franchises"
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20051217172640/http://www.polyconomics.com/searchbase/06-12-98.html ''Antitrust'' by Alan Greenspan] examines "whether active competition does inevitably lead to the establishment of coercive monopolies"
*[http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/kudlow061400.asp ''The judicial hacker''] by [[Lawrence Kudlow]] "Microsoft fails to meet the traditional standards of a coercive monopoly"
*[http://www.mackinac.org/article.aspx?ID=683 ''Regulation and monopoly''] by [[Lawrence Reed]] - contrasts coercive and efficiency monopoly
*[https://archive.today/20130415220344/http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/witch-hunting-for-robber-barons-the-standard-oil-story/ ''Witch-hunting for Robber Barons: The Standard Oil Story''] says that government causes coercive monopoly by granting privileges to firms

((DEFAULTSORT:Coercive Monopoly))
[[Category:Market failure]]
[[Category:Monopoly (economics)]]

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

Coercive monopoly (edit)
Template:Ambox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Catalog lookup link (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Template:Citation needed (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite book (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite journal (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite news (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite web (view source) (protected)
Template:Competition law (edit)
Template:Delink (view source) (protected)
Template:Find sources mainspace (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Fix (view source) (protected)
Template:Fix/category (view source) (protected)
Template:Hlist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:ISBN (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:More citations needed (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Template:ProQuest (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ref (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Template:See also (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Short description (view source) (protected)
Template:Short description/lowercasecheck (view source) (protected)
Template:Sidebar (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Unreferenced (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Unreferenced section (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Webarchive (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Who (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Yesno (view source) (protected)
Template:Yesno-no (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Yesno-yes (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Catalog lookup link (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/blacklist (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/shared (view source) (protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Check isxn (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Citation/CS1 (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Delink (view source) (protected)
Module:Disambiguation/templates (view source) (protected)
Module:Find sources (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Find sources/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Find sources/links (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Find sources/templates/Find sources mainspace (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Format link (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Hatnote (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Hatnote/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Hatnote list (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Labelled list hatnote (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Message box (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/ambox.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/disambiguation (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/setindex (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/softredirect (view source) (protected)
Module:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Module:Sidebar (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Sidebar/configuration (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Sidebar/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:String (view source) (protected)
Module:Unsubst (view source) (protected)
Module:Webarchive (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Webarchive/data (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Wikitext Parsing (view source) (protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)

Return to Coercive monopoly.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coercive_monopoly"