Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,975 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 27 March 2024 by BuySomeApples (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 7 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 9 months ago. |
Submission declined on 4 October 2023 by Ca (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Ca 10 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 18 April 2023 by Greenman (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Greenman 16 months ago. |
Brown Rudnick LLP is an international law firm with offices in New York, Boston, London and Washington, D.C. The firm is prominent in the practice areas of bankruptcy, litigation, brand and reputation management, and corporate transactions.[1][2][3][4]
Brown Rudnick was founded in 1948 by Charles Rome, Matthew Brown, Alford Rudnick, and Hirsh Freed. Originally known as Rome, Brown, Rudnick & Freed, the firm underwent several name changes due to mergers and expansions, including with Berlack Israels & Liberman in 2002.[5][6]
Brown Rudnick represented Massachusetts in its lawsuit against the tobacco industry in 1995. A master settlement agreement in 1998 between forty-six states and Big Tobacco awarded Massachusetts $8.3 billion over twenty-five years. Brown Rudnick was one five firms that was awarded $775 million by a national arbitration panel but sued for an additional $1.3 billion in legal fees.[7][8][9] In December 2023, a jury awarded an additional $100 million in fees.[10][11]
Brown Rudnick gained international attention for its representation of Johnny Depp in the 2022 Depp v. Heard trial. The trial was livestreamed, receiving widespread viewership around the world.[12][13][14][15][16] Depp's attorney Camille Vasquez became an overnight celebrity.[17][18] Following the trial, Camille Vasquez was promoted from associate to partner.[19] The trial was featured in a 2023 three-part documentary series Depp v. Heard released internationally by Netflix in August 2023.[20][21]
The firm has also represented Mexican pop star Gloria Trevi in two civil lawsuits filed by two women on December 30, 2022, in California.[22][23][24]
In October 2022, Brown Rudnick was hired by Kanye West to provide legal counsel on his business interests.[25][26] However, following West's refusal to retract his anti-Semitic remarks, the collaboration was dissolved.[27]
Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Justice hired Brown Rudnick on February 28, 2024 on a wide-ranging retainer that includes handling interactions between the ministry and the U.S. Justice Department.[28]
In June 2021, the firm sued Aylo (formerly MindGeek) and Visa in California on behalf of Serena Fleites and other child sex trafficking victims, claiming that Pornhub and MindGeek knowingly profited from videos depicting rape, child sexual exploitation, revenge porn, trafficking, and other nonconsensual sexual content.[29][30][31][32] Brown Rudnick attorney Michael Bowe was featured in the 2023 Netflix documentary Money Shot: The Pornhub Story.[33] The first scenes shot were with Bowe on the day he filed a legal complaint.[34]
In a ruling issued on July 29, 2022, U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney ruled that it was reasonable to conclude that MindGeek's activity in hosting child pornography was knowingly facilitated by Visa. The judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff Serena Fleites, and denied Visa's motion to dismiss the case.[35][36]
In August 2022, in the immediate aftermath of the decision, MasterCard and Visa jointly suspended their acceptance of payments from TrafficJunky.[37][38][39]
Brown Rudnick was part of a group of firms that led the opposition to the Texas two-step bankruptcy of Johnson & Johnson subsidiary LTL Management.[40][41][42][43]
Brown Rudnick established the Brown Rudnick Center for the Public Interest and the Brown Rudnick Charitable Foundation in 2001 with $10 million of the fees collected from the tobacco settlement.[44] The Foundation provides grants to schools and education non-profits in the cities where the firm has offices.[45]
In February 2021, Brown Rudnick and Lawyers for Civil Rights sued the city of Worcester, Massachusetts alleging that the city’s system of electing school committee members diluted the voting power of people of color and violated federal voting laws.[46][47] The city agreed to a settlement that would replace the all at-large system.[48]
According to the National Law Journal's 2024 NLJ 500 ranking of firms based on size, Brown Rudnick has 215 attorneys and is ranked 199th in the United States. With $269,521,000 gross revenue in 2023, the firm placed 139th on The American Lawyer's 2024 Am Law 200 ranking.[49]
((cite web))
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
((cite web))
: |first=
has generic name (help)
((cite web))
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
((cite web))
: Missing or empty |title=
(help)
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.