![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,547 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 28 February 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 18 December 2023 by Lewcm (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 27 November 2023 by QuantumRealm (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| ![]() |
Company type | Subsidiary[1] |
---|---|
Industry | Construction Technology |
Headquarters | Vancouver, British Columbia, Zürich, Switzerland |
Key people | Luis Pascual (President & CEO), Wade Shaw, Graham Twigg (CTO) |
Parent | Hexagon AB[1] |
Website | https://www.multivista.com/ |
Multivista Systems LLC is a construction documentation company, founded in Vancouver, British Columbia in 2003 by Luis Pascual, Wade Shaw, and Graham Twigg.[2] Pascual came up with the idea for Multivista while he was working as an electrical subcontractor, as he found it frustrating that there was no way to reference his completed work once it was covered.[3]
The company’s construction documentation services were initially focused on photo and video[4], but have since expanded to include 3D laser scanning, Building information modeling (BIM), and Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, among others.
In 2016, Multivista was acquired by Hexagon AB.[1]
In 2018, Multivista worked with sister company Leica Geosystems, Matterport, and the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation to create an online 3D model of Taliesin West.
Beginning in 2020, Multivista helped the British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT) with their plan to grow and update their 6 campuses throughout the Metro Vancouver area by providing visual documentation of their existing facilities. The project included capturing 56 buildings and documenting 3,000,000 square feet. It would be one of British Columbia’s largest-ever documentation projects.