Submission declined on 11 February 2024 by BuySomeApples (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 5 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Vanderwaalforces 7 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 3 September 2023 by Jamiebuba (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Jamiebuba 9 months ago.
|
and then we get into the conspiracy theories about Profusa which received significant independent news coverag (NOT just fleeting mentions)
Footnotes 26-29
I don't know if you're based in the United States, but 60 Minutes is a big deal over there. Wickster12345 (talk) 23:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
I just wanted to add that even IF the FORBES article is not counted that is still 4 secondary, independent sources. I am not counting the Endovascular Today article because it seems, at second glance, that one of the authors has stock in Profusa. Wickster12345 (talk) 23:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Furthermore, the article titled "A Military-Funded Biosensor Could Be the Future of Pandemic Detection - Defense One" could be seen as a 5th or 6th (depending on whether FORBES is counted= secondary, independent source because it does not refer back to or mirror any Profusa press releases, is clearly independent from Profusa: "Defense One provides news, analysis, and ideas about the future of national security to defense and industry leaders, innovative decision-makers"[1]
Wickster12345 (talk) 23:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Profusa is a digital health and medical device company based in Emeryville, California that creates wearable biosensors to get greater continuous insight into human health.
The company was cofounded in 2009 by Bill McMillan, Natalie Wisniewski and Kurt Petersen.[2] It raised $45M in Series C financing in 2018, from a group of predominantly Asia-based investors, such as 3E Bioventures Capital, VMS Investment Group, Tasly Pharmaceutical Group, and the ventures arm of the American company Maxim Integrated.[3]
A 2016 article in Forbes profiling Profusa described its sensing product, Lumee, as a “wearable biointegrated sensor.... that allows for long-term continuous monitoring of body chemistry.”[4] Profusa’s sensor is placed under the skin subcutaneously (in a non-surgical procedure) where it remains without needing to be removed, as it overcomes the foreign body response.[5][6] Profusa has to date attained European regulatory approval for Wireless Lumee Oxygen Platform, a sensing system to continuously measure oxygen levels in Peripheral Arterial Disease patients with impaired blood flow in their lower extremities.[7][8] This approval was granted on the basis of a multi-center clinical trial in Germany and Austria which showed that the sensing system could predict whether a given Critical Limb Ischemia’s patients foot wounds would heal or not, based on changes in Oxygen levels in the foot.[9] In 2018, Profusa and Lumee were profiled in the peer-reviewed journal Endovascular Today.[10]
In 2018, Frost & Sullivan awarded Profusa the award for Innovation in the Biochemical Sensors Market.[11]
Profusa sensing technology has also been used by academic researchers in animal model applications.[12] The company is also building long-lasting continuous glucose monitor, which has been featured in several books written about diabetes and disease treatment.[13][14][15] Other scientific articles have compared Profusa’s fully invasive glucose monitoring sensor with an existing system manufactured by Senseonics, with the notable difference that the former (unlike the latter) does need to be removed and contains no electronics to be inserted.[16]
Profusa has utilized DARPA, U.S. Air Force and NIH research grants to facilitate its research and development, with relevant studies conducted at Duke University and Imperial College, among other sites.[17][18][19][20] These programs include using oxygen sensors to predict influenza and Covid-19 outbreaks on a population level. [21] [22]
The U.S. Air Force has also sponsored Profusa through grants, with its pilots using the company's proprietary lactate sensor to test the monitoring of pilot performance.[23]
Profusa has been the subject of several conspiracy theories due to the nature of its technology. One in particular explored the use of Profusa Oxygen sensors in early flu and COVID-19 detection, being investigated by DARPA.[24][25][26] This led to accusations that the U.S. government was building government tracking microchips.
These conspiracy theories, and Profusa’s connection to them, have been covered in different American media outlets. Responding to an inquiry from USA Today for the purpose of an article on the topic, Jared Adams, chief of communications for DARPA, stated in 2021 that “Profusa’s technology is not a hydrogel chip that will connect you to the Internet".[27] Newsweek also covered a separate but related controversy in 2020 about DARPA testing Profusa’s sensor for early flu detection.[28] This referred to a conspiracy theory initially advanced by conservative author Thomas Horn on a show hosted by televangelist Jim Bakker. Other outlets also covered this conspiracy theory.[29] Profusa technology was additionally featured on a 60 Minutes segment about the U.S. government’s response to COVID-19 in terms of investing in research related to emerging technologies.[30] There were books written about Profusa-related conspiracy theories in language other than English.[31]
Profusa was also profiled in an article by left-wing news site MintPress News where its technology was stated to "open the door to the potential manipulation of our biological responses and, ultimately, our entire existence".[32]
On November 7th of 2022, Profusa announced it would be going public in a SPAC transaction with NorthView Acquisition Corp, already listed on NASDAQ as NVAC. In response to the SPAC filing, some commentators highlighted the difficulty of Profusa achieving its vision to challenge Dexcom and Abbott’s dominance in the continuous glucose monitoring space, citing reimbursement and other commercialization hurdles.[33] Northview has submitted multiple drafts of a formal filing for the SPAC merger, an S-4 form, to the SEC, the response to which remains pending as of September 12th 2023. Upon approval, Northview and Profusa have declared the newly formed entity would trade under the name Profusa and the ticker symbol of PFSA.[34]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.