Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,773 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Una Nation (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Bing, Wikipedia) · Submitted 2 months ago by LivingWellat50 (talk: D · +) · Last edited 2 months ago by LivingWellat50

Submission declined on 19 March 2024 by WikiDan61 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by WikiDan61 2 months ago. Last edited by LivingWellat50 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 14 March 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 13 March 2024 by WikiDan61 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by WikiDan61 2 months ago.

• Comment: The article is now more accurate and less full of puffery, but it still offers no indications that this group has received significant, coverage in any independent media, outside of the one event of offering membership to Senator Warren. (A failed political stunt, really, since there is no indication that Warren accepted the membership or even ever acknowledged the offer.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: I went through and extracted as much information as I could about the group and presented it in a more neutral tone. Some of the sources are somewhat unreliable and I don't know if there is enough coverage for any more writing. PersusjCP (talk) 17:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: This group seems to have mostly made news through its stunt of offering Elizabeth Warren membership. The claim of 250 million members (which has been corrected) as well as the explanations of why their leader is called "King" while other indigenous groups tend to use "Chief" are misleading and appear to be attempts to give this group more legitimacy than is due. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

The Una Nation of Mixed-Bloods, an unrecognized Native American Mixed-blood tribal group of Mixed-bloods, based in Eugene, Oregon, claim to be a "Native American Mixed-Blood tribe."^[1] The group offers enrollment to anyone with at least one Native American ancestor.^[2]

History

In 2015, the Una Nation announced it had renounced all monetary and benefit rights that recognition would bring.^[3] Subsequently, they sought state recognition from Oregon, where they are based.^[4][5]

In 2016, the mayor of Springfield, Oregon read a proclamation recognizing and honoring the Una Nation.^[6]

In 2019, the group announced that it had offered tribal enrollment to Senator Elizabeth Warren.^[7] In the same year, the tribe claimed 35,000 enrolled members.^[8]