This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (December 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In statistics, the **explained sum of squares** (**ESS**), alternatively known as the **model sum of squares** or **sum of squares due to regression** (**SSR** – not to be confused with the residual sum of squares (RSS) or sum of squares of errors), is a quantity used in describing how well a model, often a regression model, represents the data being modelled. In particular, the explained sum of squares measures how much variation there is in the modelled values and this is compared to the total sum of squares (TSS), which measures how much variation there is in the observed data, and to the residual sum of squares, which measures the variation in the error between the observed data and modelled values.

The explained sum of squares (ESS) is the sum of the squares of the deviations of the predicted values from the mean value of a response variable, in a standard regression model — for example, *y*_{i} = *a* + *b*_{1}*x*_{1i} + *b*_{2}*x*_{2i} + ... + *ε*_{i}, where *y*_{i} is the *i* ^{th} observation of the response variable, *x*_{ji} is the *i* ^{th} observation of the *j* ^{th} explanatory variable, *a* and *b*_{j} are coefficients, *i* indexes the observations from 1 to *n*, and *ε*_{i} is the *i* ^{th} value of the error term. In general, the greater the ESS, the better the estimated model performs.

If and are the estimated coefficients, then

is the *i*^{ th} predicted value of the response variable. The ESS is then:

- where is the value estimated by the regression line .
^{[1]}

In some cases (see below): total sum of squares (TSS) = explained sum of squares (ESS) + residual sum of squares (RSS).

The following equality, stating that the total sum of squares (TSS) equals the residual sum of squares (=SSE : the sum of squared errors of prediction) plus the explained sum of squares (SSR :the sum of squares due to regression or explained sum of squares), is generally true in simple linear regression:

Square both sides and sum over all *i*:

Here is how the last term above is zero from simple linear regression^{[2]}

So,

Therefore,

The general regression model with *n* observations and *k* explanators, the first of which is a constant unit vector whose coefficient is the regression intercept, is

where *y* is an *n* × 1 vector of dependent variable observations, each column of the *n* × *k* matrix *X* is a vector of observations on one of the *k* explanators, is a *k* × 1 vector of true coefficients, and *e* is an *n* × 1 vector of the true underlying errors. The ordinary least squares estimator for is

The residual vector is , so the residual sum of squares is, after simplification,

Denote as the constant vector all of whose elements are the sample mean of the dependent variable values in the vector *y*. Then the total sum of squares is

The explained sum of squares, defined as the sum of squared deviations of the predicted values from the observed mean of *y*, is

Using in this, and simplifying to obtain , gives the result that *TSS* = *ESS* + *RSS* if and only if . The left side of this is times the sum of the elements of *y*, and the right side is times the sum of the elements of , so the condition is that the sum of the elements of *y* equals the sum of the elements of , or equivalently that the sum of the prediction errors (residuals) is zero. This can be seen to be true by noting the well-known OLS property that the *k* × 1 vector : since the first column of *X* is a vector of ones, the first element of this vector is the sum of the residuals and is equal to zero. This proves that the condition holds for the result that *TSS* = *ESS* + *RSS*.

In linear algebra terms, we have , , . The proof can be simplified by noting that . The proof is as follows:

Thus,

which again gives the result that *TSS* = *ESS* + *RSS*, since .