This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
The infobox(or whatever that is) in Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is looking ugly in a book. See this book for example. I want to use the ((Hide in print)) template. First of all, can the template be used on other templates?? I'm also worried that it might affect books of other people(who may not have the same opinion). What should I do?? Roshan220195 (talk) 16:58, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
An article on a science-related topic would contain all beginner, intermediate and advanced concepts related to the topic. However, if I were to create a book like "Introduction to ...." I would be needing only beginner concepts in it. There is no point in feeding advanced concepts to people who don't have a clue about what the topic actually is. So, I would suggest the usage of templates to mark portions of the article appropriately and an option in the Book creator to choose which portion to include. Roshan (talk) 17:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
What can be the alternative for animations in a book? Roshan (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
G'day there, I am interested to know if it is possible to obtain an ISBN for my Wikibook? If so, what is the procedure? Thanks, Ben Benwebboz (talk) 09:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
When rendering the page Shoelace formula using "Download as PDF" the last image (File:ShoelaceMatrix3.GIF) in the article was not included, nor was it listed under Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors. This was brought up before in March of 2009 (section 47), but it was supposed to be fixed in the next update. Nat2 (talk) 22:29, 27 July 2012 (UTC)