Wheelchair ramp, Hotel Montescot, Chartres, France
Demonstration inclined plane used in education, Museo Galileo, Florence.

An inclined plane, also known as a ramp, is a flat supporting surface tilted at an angle from the vertical direction, with one end higher than the other, used as an aid for raising or lowering a load.[1][2][3] The inclined plane is one of the six classical simple machines defined by Renaissance scientists. Inclined planes are used to move heavy loads over vertical obstacles. Examples vary from a ramp used to load goods into a truck, to a person walking up a pedestrian ramp, to an automobile or railroad train climbing a grade.[3]

Moving an object up an inclined plane requires less force than lifting it straight up, at a cost of an increase in the distance moved.[4] The mechanical advantage of an inclined plane, the factor by which the force is reduced, is equal to the ratio of the length of the sloped surface to the height it spans. Owing to conservation of energy, the same amount of mechanical energy (work) is required to lift a given object by a given vertical distance, disregarding losses from friction, but the inclined plane allows the same work to be done with a smaller force exerted over a greater distance.[5][6]

The angle of friction,[7] also sometimes called the angle of repose,[8] is the maximum angle at which a load can rest motionless on an inclined plane due to friction without sliding down. This angle is equal to the arctangent of the coefficient of static friction μs between the surfaces.[8]

Two other simple machines are often considered to be derived from the inclined plane.[9] The wedge can be considered a moving inclined plane or two inclined planes connected at the base.[5] The screw consists of a narrow inclined plane wrapped around a cylinder.[5]

The term may also refer to a specific implementation; a straight ramp cut into a steep hillside for transporting goods up and down the hill. This may include cars on rails or pulled up by a cable system; a funicular or cable railway, such as the Johnstown Inclined Plane.


Inclined planes are widely used in the form of loading ramps to load and unload goods on trucks, ships and planes.[3] Wheelchair ramps are used to allow people in wheelchairs to get over vertical obstacles without exceeding their strength. Escalators and slanted conveyor belts are also forms of an inclined plane.[6]In a funicular or cable railway a railroad car is pulled up a steep inclined plane using cables. Inclined planes also allow heavy fragile objects, including humans, to be safely lowered down a vertical distance by using the normal force of the plane to reduce the gravitational force. Aircraft evacuation slides allow people to rapidly and safely reach the ground from the height of a passenger airliner.

Using ramps to load a car on a truck
Loading a truck on a ship using a ramp
Aircraft emergency evacuation slide
Wheelchair ramp on Japanese bus
Loading ramp on a truck

Other inclined planes are built into permanent structures. Roads for vehicles and railroads have inclined planes in the form of gradual slopes, ramps, and causeways to allow vehicles to surmount vertical obstacles such as hills without losing traction on the road surface.[3] Similarly, pedestrian paths and sidewalks have gentle ramps to limit their slope, to ensure that pedestrians can keep traction.[1][4] Inclined planes are also used as entertainment for people to slide down in a controlled way, in playground slides, water slides, ski slopes and skateboard parks.

Earth ramp (right) built by Romans in 72 AD to invade Masada, Israel
Pedestrian ramp, Palacio do Planalto, Brasilia
Johnstown Inclined Plane, a funicular railroad.
Burma Road, Assam, India, through Burma to China, c. 1945
Inclined planes in a skateboard park


Stevin's proof
In 1586, Flemish engineer Simon Stevin (Stevinus) derived the mechanical advantage of the inclined plane by an argument that used a string of beads.[10] He imagined two inclined planes of equal height but different slopes, placed back-to-back as in a prism (A, B, C above). A loop of string with beads at equal intervals is draped over the inclined planes, with part of the string hanging down below. The beads resting on the planes act as loads on the planes, held up by the tension force in the string at point T. Stevin's argument goes like this:[10][11][12]
  • The string must be stationary, in static equilibrium. If the string was heavier on one side than the other, and began to slide right or left under its own weight, when each bead had moved to the position of the previous bead the string would be indistinguishable from its initial position and therefore would continue to be unbalanced and slide. This argument could be repeated indefinitely, resulting in a circular perpetual motion, which is absurd. Therefore, it is stationary, with the forces on the two sides at point T (above) equal.
  • The portion of the chain hanging below the inclined planes is symmetrical, with an equal number of beads on each side. It exerts an equal force on each side of the string. Therefore, this portion of the string can be cut off at the edges of the planes (points S and V), leaving only the beads resting on the inclined planes, and this remaining portion will still be in static equilibrium.
  • Since the beads are at equal intervals on the string, the total number of beads supported by each plane, the total load, is proportional to the length of the plane. Since the input supporting force, the tension in the string, is the same for both, the mechanical advantage of each plane is proportional to its slant length

As pointed out by Dijksterhuis,[13] Stevin's argument is not completely tight. The forces exerted by the hanging part of the chain need not be symmetrical because the hanging part need not retain its shape when let go. Even if the chain is released with a zero angular momentum, motion including oscillations is possible unless the chain is initially in its equilibrium configuration, a supposition which would make the argument circular.

Inclined planes have been used by people since prehistoric times to move heavy objects.[14][15] The sloping roads and causeways built by ancient civilizations such as the Romans are examples of early inclined planes that have survived, and show that they understood the value of this device for moving things uphill. The heavy stones used in ancient stone structures such as Stonehenge[16] are believed to have been moved and set in place using inclined planes made of earth,[17] although it is hard to find evidence of such temporary building ramps. The Egyptian pyramids were constructed using inclined planes,[18][19][20] Siege ramps enabled ancient armies to surmount fortress walls. The ancient Greeks constructed a paved ramp 6 km (3.7 miles) long, the Diolkos, to drag ships overland across the Isthmus of Corinth.[4]

However the inclined plane was the last of the six classic simple machines to be recognised as a machine. This is probably because it is a passive and motionless device (the load is the moving part),[21] and also because it is found in nature in the form of slopes and hills. Although they understood its use in lifting heavy objects, the ancient Greek philosophers who defined the other five simple machines did not include the inclined plane as a machine.[22] This view persisted among a few later scientists; as late as 1826 Karl von Langsdorf wrote that an inclined plane "...is no more a machine than is the slope of a mountain".[21] The problem of calculating the force required to push a weight up an inclined plane (its mechanical advantage) was attempted by Greek philosophers Heron of Alexandria (c. 10 - 60 CE) and Pappus of Alexandria (c. 290 - 350 CE), but their solutions were incorrect.[23][24][25]

It was not until the Renaissance that the inclined plane was solved mathematically and classed with the other simple machines. The first correct analysis of the inclined plane appeared in the work of 13th century author Jordanus de Nemore,[26][27] however his solution was apparently not communicated to other philosophers of the time.[24] Girolamo Cardano (1570) proposed the incorrect solution that the input force is proportional to the angle of the plane.[10] Then at the end of the 16th century, three correct solutions were published within ten years, by Michael Varro (1584), Simon Stevin (1586), and Galileo Galilei (1592).[24] Although it was not the first, the derivation of Flemish engineer Simon Stevin[25] is the most well-known, because of its originality and use of a string of beads (see box).[12][26] In 1600, Italian scientist Galileo Galilei included the inclined plane in his analysis of simple machines in Le Meccaniche ("On Mechanics"), showing its underlying similarity to the other machines as a force amplifier.[28]

The first elementary rules of sliding friction on an inclined plane were discovered by Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), but remained unpublished in his notebooks.[29] They were rediscovered by Guillaume Amontons (1699) and were further developed by Charles-Augustin de Coulomb (1785).[29] Leonhard Euler (1750) showed that the tangent of the angle of repose on an inclined plane is equal to the coefficient of friction.[30]



The mechanical advantage of an inclined plane depends on its slope, meaning its gradient or steepness. The smaller the slope, the larger the mechanical advantage, and the smaller the force needed to raise a given weight. A plane's slope s is equal to the difference in height between its two ends, or "rise", divided by its horizontal length, or "run".[31] It can also be expressed by the angle the plane makes with the horizontal, .

The inclined plane's geometry is based on a right triangle.[31] The horizontal length is sometimes called Run, the vertical change in height Rise.

Mechanical advantage

The mechanical advantage of a simple machine is defined as the ratio of the output force exerted on the load to the input force applied. For the inclined plane the output load force is just the gravitational force of the load object on the plane, its weight . The input force is the force exerted on the object, parallel to the plane, to move it up the plane. The mechanical advantage is

The of an ideal inclined plane without friction is sometimes called ideal mechanical advantage while the MA when friction is included is called the actual mechanical advantage .[32]

Frictionless inclined plane

Instrumented inclined plane used for physics education, around 1900. The lefthand weight provides the load force . The righthand weight provides the input force pulling the roller up the plane.

If there is no friction between the object being moved and the plane, the device is called an ideal inclined plane. This condition might be approached if the object is rolling like a barrel, or supported on wheels or casters. Due to conservation of energy, for a frictionless inclined plane the work done on the load lifting it, , is equal to the work done by the input force, [33][34][35]

Work is defined as the force multiplied by the displacement an object moves. The work done on the load is equal to its weight multiplied by the vertical displacement it rises, which is the "rise" of the inclined plane

The input work is equal to the force on the object times the diagonal length of the inclined plane.

Substituting these values into the conservation of energy equation above and rearranging

To express the mechanical advantage by the angle of the plane,[34] it can be seen from the diagram (above) that


So the mechanical advantage of a frictionless inclined plane is equal to the reciprocal of the sine of the slope angle. The input force from this equation is the force needed to hold the load motionless on the inclined plane, or push it up at a constant velocity. If the input force is greater than this, the load will accelerate up the plane. If the force is less, it will accelerate down the plane.

Inclined plane with friction

Where there is friction between the plane and the load, as for example with a heavy box being slid up a ramp, some of the work applied by the input force is dissipated as heat by friction, , so less work is done on the load. Due to conservation of energy, the sum of the output work and the frictional energy losses is equal to the input work

Therefore, more input force is required, and the mechanical advantage is lower, than if friction were not present. With friction, the load will only move if the net force parallel to the surface is greater than the frictional force opposing it.[8][36][37] The maximum friction force is given by

where is the normal force between the load and the plane, directed normal to the surface, and is the coefficient of static friction between the two surfaces, which varies with the material. When no input force is applied, if the inclination angle of the plane is less than some maximum value the component of gravitational force parallel to the plane will be too small to overcome friction, and the load will remain motionless. This angle is called the angle of repose and depends on the composition of the surfaces, but is independent of the load weight. It is shown below that the tangent of the angle of repose is equal to

With friction, there is always some range of input force for which the load is stationary, neither sliding up or down the plane, whereas with a frictionless inclined plane there is only one particular value of input force for which the load is stationary.


Key: Fn = N = Normal force that is perpendicular to the plane, Fi = f = input force, Fw = mg = weight of the load, where m = mass, g = gravity

A load resting on an inclined plane, when considered as a free body has three forces acting on it:[8][36][37]

Using Newton's second law of motion the load will be stationary or in steady motion if the sum of the forces on it is zero. Since the direction of the frictional force is opposite for the case of uphill and downhill motion, these two cases must be considered separately:

Derivation of mechanical advantage for uphill motion

The equilibrium equations for forces parallel and perpendicular to the plane are

Substituting into first equation
Solving second equation to get and substituting into the above equation
Using a sum-of-angles trigonometric identity on the denominator,
The mechanical advantage is
where . This is the condition for impending motion up the inclined plane. If the applied force Fi is greater than given by this equation, the load will move up the plane.
Derivation of mechanical advantage for downhill motion

The equilibrium equations are

Substituting into first equation
Solving second equation to get and substituting into the above equation
Substituting in and simplifying as above
Using another trigonometric identity on the denominator,
The mechanical advantage is
This is the condition for impending motion down the plane; if the applied force Fi is less than given in this equation, the load will slide down the plane. There are three cases:
  1. : The mechanical advantage is negative. In the absence of applied force the load will remain motionless, and requires some negative (downhill) applied force to slide down.
  2. : The 'angle of repose'. The mechanical advantage is infinite. With no applied force, load will not slide, but the slightest negative (downhill) force will cause it to slide.
  3. : The mechanical advantage is positive. In the absence of applied force the load will slide down the plane, and requires some positive (uphill) force to hold it motionless

Mechanical advantage using power

Key: N = Normal force that is perpendicular to the plane, W=mg, where m = mass, g = gravity, and θ (theta) = Angle of inclination of the plane

The mechanical advantage of an inclined plane is the ratio of the weight of the load on the ramp to the force required to pull it up the ramp. If energy is not dissipated or stored in the movement of the load, then this mechanical advantage can be computed from the dimensions of the ramp.

In order to show this, let the position r of a rail car on along the ramp with an angle, θ, above the horizontal be given by

where R is the distance along the ramp. The velocity of the car up the ramp is now

Because there are no losses, the power used by force F to move the load up the ramp equals the power out, which is the vertical lift of the weight W of the load.

The input power pulling the car up the ramp is given by

and the power out is

Equate the power in to the power out to obtain the mechanical advantage as

The mechanical advantage of an inclined plane can also be calculated from the ratio of length of the ramp L to its height H, because the sine of the angle of the ramp is given by


Layout of the cable drive system for the Liverpool Minard inclined plane.

Example: If the height of a ramp is H = 1 meter and its length is L = 5 meters, then the mechanical advantage is

which means that a 20 lb force will lift a 100 lb load.

The Liverpool Minard inclined plane has the dimensions 1804 meters by 37.50 meters, which provides a mechanical advantage of

so a 100 lb tension force on the cable will lift a 4810 lb load. The grade of this incline is 2%, which means the angle θ is small enough that sin θ≈tan θ.

See also


  1. ^ a b Cole, Matthew (2005). Explore science, 2nd Ed. Pearson Education. p. 178. ISBN 978-981-06-2002-8.
  2. ^ Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 11th Ed. Merriam-Webster. 2003. pp. 629. ISBN 978-0-87779-809-5. inclined plane definition dictionary.
  3. ^ a b c d "The Inclined Plane". Math and science activity center. Edinformatics. 1999. Retrieved March 11, 2012.
  4. ^ a b c Silverman, Buffy (2009). Simple Machines: Forces in Action, 4th Ed. USA: Heinemann-Raintree Classroom. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-4329-2317-4.
  5. ^ a b c Ortleb, Edward P.; Richard Cadice (1993). Machines and Work. Lorenz Educational Press. pp. iv. ISBN 978-1-55863-060-4.
  6. ^ a b Reilly, Travis (November 24, 2011). "Lesson 04:Slide Right on By Using an Inclined Plane". Teach Engineering. College of Engineering, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder. Archived from the original on May 8, 2012. Retrieved September 8, 2012.
  7. ^ Scott, John S. (1993). Dictionary of Civil Engineering. Chapman & Hill. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-412-98421-1. angle of friction [mech.] in the study of bodies sliding on plane surfaces, the angle between the perpendicular to the surface and the resultant force (between the body and the surface) when the body begins to slide. angle of repose [s.m.] for any given granular material the steepest angle to the horizontal at which a heaped surface will stand in stated conditions.
  8. ^ a b c d Ambekar, A. G. (2007). Mechanism and Machine Theory. PHI Learning. p. 446. ISBN 978-81-203-3134-1. Angle of repose is the limiting angle of inclination of a plane when a body, placed on the inclined plane, just starts sliding down the plane.
  9. ^ Rosen, Joe; Lisa Quinn Gothard (2009). Encyclopedia of Physical Science, Volume 1. Infobase Publishing. p. 375. ISBN 978-0-8160-7011-4.
  10. ^ a b c Koetsier, Teun (2010). "Simon Stevin and the rise of Archimedean mechanics in the Renaissance". The Genius of Archimedes – 23 Centuries of Influence on Mathematics, Science and Engineering: Proceedings of an International Conference Held at Syracuse, Italy, June 8–10, 2010. Springer. pp. 94–99. ISBN 978-90-481-9090-4.
  11. ^ Devreese, Jozef T.; Guido Vanden Berghe (2008). 'Magic is no magic': The wonderful world of Simon Stevin. WIT Press. pp. 136–139. ISBN 978-1-84564-391-1.
  12. ^ a b Feynman, Richard P.; Robert B. Leighton; Matthew Sands (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. I. USA: California Inst. of Technology. pp. 4.4–4.5. ISBN 978-0-465-02493-3.
  13. ^ E.J.Dijksterhuis: Simon Stevin 1943
  14. ^ Therese McGuire, Light on Sacred Stones, in Conn, Marie A.; Therese Benedict McGuire (2007). Not etched in stone: essays on ritual memory, soul, and society. University Press of America. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-7618-3702-2.
  15. ^ Dutch, Steven (1999). "Pre-Greek Accomplishments". Legacy of the Ancient World. Prof. Steve Dutch's page, Univ. of Wisconsin at Green Bay. Archived from the original on August 21, 2016. Retrieved March 13, 2012.
  16. ^ Moffett, Marian; Michael W. Fazio; Lawrence Wodehouse (2003). A world history of architecture. Laurence King Publishing. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-85669-371-4.
  17. ^ Peet, T. Eric (2006). Rough Stone Monuments and Their Builders. Echo Library. pp. 11–12. ISBN 978-1-4068-2203-8.
  18. ^ Thomas, Burke (2005). "Transport and the Inclined Plane". Construction of the Giza Pyramids. world-mysteries.com. Archived from the original on March 13, 2012. Retrieved March 10, 2012.
  19. ^ Isler, Martin (2001). Sticks, stones, and shadows: building the Egyptian pyramids. USA: University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 211–216. ISBN 978-0-8061-3342-3.
  20. ^ Sprague de Camp, L. (1990). The Ancient Engineers. USA: Barnes & Noble. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-88029-456-0.
  21. ^ a b Karl von Langsdorf (1826) Machinenkunde, quoted in Reuleaux, Franz (1876). The kinematics of machinery: Outlines of a theory of machines. MacMillan. pp. 604.
  22. ^ for example, the lists of simple machines left by Roman architect Vitruvius (c. 80 – 15 BCE) and Greek philosopher Heron of Alexandria (c. 10 – 70 CE) consist of the five classical simple machines, excluding the inclined plane. – Smith, William (1848). Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. London: Walton and Maberly; John Murray. p. 722., Usher, Abbott Payson (1988). A History of Mechanical Inventions. USA: Courier Dover Publications. pp. 98, 120. ISBN 978-0-486-25593-4.
  23. ^ Heath, Thomas Little (1921). A History of Greek Mathematics, Vol. 2. UK: The Clarendon Press. pp. 349, 433–434.
  24. ^ a b c Egidio Festa and Sophie Roux, The enigma of the inclined plane in Laird, Walter Roy; Sophie Roux (2008). Mechanics and natural philosophy before the scientific revolution. USA: Springer. pp. 195–221. ISBN 978-1-4020-5966-7.
  25. ^ a b Meli, Domenico Bertoloni (2006). Thinking With Objects: The Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century. JHU Press. pp. 35–39. ISBN 978-0-8018-8426-9.
  26. ^ a b Boyer, Carl B.; Uta C. Merzbach (2010). A History of Mathematics, 3rd Ed. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-63056-3.
  27. ^ Usher, Abbott Payson (1988). A History of Mechanical Inventions. Courier Dover Publications. p. 106. ISBN 978-0-486-25593-4.
  28. ^ Machamer, Peter K. (1998). The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. London: Cambridge University Press. pp. 47–48. ISBN 978-0-521-58841-6.
  29. ^ a b Armstrong-Hélouvry, Brian (1991). Control of machines with friction. USA: Springer. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-7923-9133-3.
  30. ^ Meyer, Ernst (2002). Nanoscience: friction and rheology on the nanometer scale. World Scientific. p. 7. ISBN 978-981-238-062-3.
  31. ^ a b Handley, Brett; David M. Marshall; Craig Coon (2011). Principles of Engineering. Cengage Learning. pp. 71–73. ISBN 978-1-4354-2836-2.
  32. ^ Dennis, Johnnie T. (2003). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Physics. Penguin. pp. 116–117. ISBN 978-1-59257-081-2.
  33. ^ Nave, Carl R. (2010). "The Incline". Hyperphysics. Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State Univ. Retrieved September 8, 2012.
  34. ^ a b Martin, Lori (2010). "Lab Mech14:The Inclined Plane - A Simple Machine" (PDF). Science in Motion. Westminster College. Retrieved September 8, 2012.
  35. ^ Pearson (2009). Physics class 10 - The IIT Foundation Series. New Delhi: Pearson Education India. p. 69. ISBN 978-81-317-2843-7.
  36. ^ a b Bansal, R.K (2005). Engineering Mechanics and Strength of Materials. Laxmi Publications. pp. 165–167. ISBN 978-81-7008-094-7.
  37. ^ a b This derives slightly more general equations which cover force applied at any angle: Gujral, I.S. (2008). Engineering Mechanics. Firewall Media. pp. 275–277. ISBN 978-81-318-0295-3.