The Second Swedish Crusade was a possible 13th-century Swedish military expedition against the Tavastians, in present-day Finland, led by Birger Jarl. Many details of the Crusade are debated. After the crusade, Tavastia gradually started to fall under the rule of the Catholic Church and the Swedish kingdom.
Background
A sculpted head in Varnhem Church, identified as the likeness of Birger Jarl, leader of the Crusade
Sweden had been starting to exert control over Finland at least since the beginning in the 13th century, starting with Finland proper. In 1220, Sweden tried to join in on the Baltic Crusades, but could not hold on to their foothold in Estonia. There are notes of Swedish churchmen, possibly led by Finland's bishopThomas, being present in Tavastia ca 1230, and papal letters deplored how slowly Christianity gained ground in Finland. There was apparently a backlash against the missionaries (the Häme insurrection), and in 1237, Pope Gregory IX sent out a call for the Swedes to take up arms in a crusade against the "apostates and barbarians".[2][3]
Sources
All details of the crusade are from Eric's Chronicle, which is largely propagandist in nature, written a century after the events, amidst internal unrest and a war against Novgorod. The chronicle says that the crusade took place between the Battle of Sparrsätra in 1247 and the death of King Eric (XI) in 1250, and presents the Tavastians (taffwesta) as the Swedes' opponents. According to the chronicle, the expedition was prepared in Sweden and then conducted over sea to a land on the coast, where the enemy was waiting.[4]
The Chronicle also mentioned that a castle called taffwesta borg was established after the war. The Chronicle also linked the Crusade to a contest with the Orthodox Russians, making a point of the fact that the "Russian king" had now lost the conquered land.
The so-called "Detmar Chronicle" of Lübeck from around 1340 confirmed the expedition with a short note that Birger Jarl submitted Finland under Swedish rule.[5]
Interpretations
Unlike the dubious First Swedish crusade, there seems to be little doubt that Sweden's effort to Christianize Finland reached a culmination in the middle of the 13th century. Still, many details, including the year and the exact nature, remain the subject of debate.
Nature of the Crusade
Although the Chronicles attempted to paint the Crusade as a war of conquest, it was likely more of an unusually bloody phase in the ongoing process by which Finland was incorporated in the Swedish state. Sweden had a central government and a strong ideological force in the form of the Catholic church. The Finnish chieftains who joined gained power and prestige.[6]
Dating
The dating of the Crusade has been somewhat disputed. In addition to the 1247–1250 date given in "Eric's Chronicle", proposals have been made to date the attack to either 1238–1239 or 1256. Neither of the latter dates has received wide acceptance.[7] Swedish historian Dick Harrison finds the theory of an early crusade most probable, based on the papal letter, which would also make the war a properly sanctioned crusade, and the fact that Sweden was otherwise peaceful during that period.[8]
Taffwesta borg
The Chronicle mentioned an impressive castle that was built by the Swedes, taffwesta borg. This has been interpreted as either Häme Castle (Swedish Tavastehus) or the nearby Hakoinen Castle, but there is no archaeological evidence at either site to support such an early dating.
Probably in an effort to prevent other parties from getting involved in the conflict, Pope Innocent IV took Finland under his special protection in August 1249 but without mentioning Sweden in any way.[9] The bishop of Finland, Thomas, probably a Dominican friar, had resigned already in 1245 and died three years later in a Dominican convent in Gotland. The seat being vacant, the diocese had probably been under the direct command of the papal legate, William of Modena, whose last orders to Finnish priests were given in June 1248.[10]
Bero was eventually appointed as the new bishop in 1248/9, presumably soon after William's visit to Sweden for an important church meeting at Skänninge that ended on 1 March 1248. The so-called "Palmsköld booklet" from 1448 noted that it was Bero who gave the Finns' tax to the Swedish king.[11] Bero came directly from the Swedish court, like his two successors. It seems that Swedish bishops also held all secular power in Finland until the 1280s, when the position of the Duke of Finland was established.
In 1249, the situation was also seen clear enough[further explanation needed] to establish the first monastery in Finland, a Dominican convent.[12] The convent was next to the bishop's fortification in Koroinen until the end of the century.
Swedish succession
Eric's Chronicle tells of how, as an unexpected side effect, the expedition seems to have cost Birger the Swedish crown. When King Eric died in 1250, Birger was absent from Sweden. The Swedish lords, led by Joar Blå, selected Birger's underaged son Valdemar as the new king, instead of the powerful jarl himself.
Swedish rule in Finland
From 1249 onwards, sources generally regard Finland Proper and Tavastia as a part of Sweden. The Diocese of Finland proper is listed among the Swedish dioceses for the first time in 1253.[13] In the Novgorod First Chronicle, Tavastians (yem) and Finns proper (sum) are mentioned on an expedition with Swedes (svei) in 1256.[14] However, very little is known about the situation in Finland in the following decades. That is partly because Western Finland was now ruled from Turku and so most of the documents remained there. As the Novgorod forces burned the city in 1318 during the Swedish-Novgorodian Wars, very few of the documents about what had happened in the previous century remained. The last Swedish Crusade to Finland took place in 1293 against Karelians.
Eric's Chronicle: "Crusade against Tavastians"
King Erik then sent out a call
to knights and to their equals all,
to peasants and to fighting men,
– as ruler still do now, as then,
to notify their men before
they send them off to fight a war –
he sent them thus to heathen land
and chose his in-law to take in hand
to lead them all upon that quest,
for him of all he trusted best.
His son-in-law was eager to go,
keen his honour there to show.
Then arms and armour were prepared
by warriors brave, who nothing feared.
Helmets and body-armour burnished
were in demand, and more were furnished.
Each in his district did his best,
ready to heed the king`s request,
and warships and transport set afloat.
Many a money-bag was brought out,
its contents did those men receive
who now their homes were due to leave
not knowing where their journey led
Hands were wrung and tears were shed
by many a wife left on her own.
Yet they rejoiced that God`s renown
would grow and He be more adored.
Many an old ancestral sword
was then from nails unslung
where it for many a day had hung.
Their friends them followed to the strand
to bid farewell and clasp their hand
Many a red mouth was kissed that day
that never again was kissed that way,
for some never more would each other see such can the outcome of such partings be.
Fair winds arose, the sails were set.
The heathen, too, foresaw the threat
they well knew that their coming would
be to their harm and not their good.
There the Christians a harbour did find.
Innumerable gilded prows aligned
the heathen men saw lying there,
causing them less to laugh than fear.
They took their banners and went ashore.
Fate then favored the Christians more:
their bright shields there and helmets they
throughout that country did display.
They eager were to try their swords
upon the Heathen Tavast hordes,
which I expect is what occurred.
With gold and silver and many a herd
of cattle the Tavasts away did run.
The heathen lost, the Christians won.
Whoever would this them agree
to become a Christian and baptised be,
him they allowed both goods and life
and peace to live withour further strife.
The heathen who would them gainsay
they did mercilessly slay.
The Christians there a fortress did build,
which they with friend and kinsmen filled.
That castle they Tavasteborg did call;
it to this day does the heathen gall.
With Christian men they settled that land,
a deed, I think, that does yet stand.
That land became Christian through and through the Russian king its loss must rue.
.jpg)
