02:2002:20, 14 October 2021diffhist+96
Patrick Drahi
The French-language article (which has been challenged by the minority of commenters there as "racist") supposedly substantiating him holding a Moroccan passport doesn't mention any of the nationalities actually. Needless to add, non-English language articles ought to discouraged on this project in favour of those published in a type of International English. Regardless, most English-language sources mention his French-Israeli citizenship. Few mention that he latest became Portuguese. But no 🇲🇦Tag: Visual edit
20 April 2021
15:4615:46, 20 April 2021diffhist−17
Single Parents (TV series)
Fixed redundancy by adding the ultimate global-distribution business. "Revert"-itching editors please note: Even if the WP:OR exceptions for WP:TV (assuming it exists, at first place) — a distributor is mostly not credited on-screen of any English-language audiovisual content.Tags: RevertedVisual edit
14:4114:41, 20 April 2021diffhist+33
Al Jazeera Balkans
→Serbia: Fixed the translated-quote diatribe from a Serbian commenter, because it was so messy. It euphemised parts of his words, and sensationalised softer parts of it. Worse.. It invokes quotes where the cited-source has merely paraphrased him, in straight contravention of MOS:QUOTES. Also re-arranged quotes, per MOS:QWQ.Tag: Visual edit
14:1614:16, 20 April 2021diffhist−338
Al Jazeera Balkans
Removed dead-wikilinks throughout the article, replaced the redundant "| network =" and replaced "| owner =" parameters in the infobox, in line with the sister-articles. Updated a citation and also, changed a wording closer to its sister-articles since it was clearly not what the cited-source said.Tag: Visual edit
10:0310:03, 20 April 2021diffhist+247
User talk:103.163.124.95
→FYI: Clarification-related corrections, no change to context whatsoever — hopefully Mx “wolf”, you won't start comparing to the formatting in this correction to my other talk-page engagements — lest you get even more confused 😉
03:0503:05, 20 April 2021diffhist+232
Riz Ahmed
Added "proveit" template at one place owing to missing verification, indie-imprints of his work, removed the retired parameter "|background =" in musical-artist infoboxTags: possible unreferenced addition to BLPVisual edit
05:4205:42, 17 April 2021diffhist+589
User talk:Fanardal
Undid revision 1013004898 by Fanardal (talk): Unless you carry the intent to mend your ways in accordance with WP:BRD and implement them, don't make it worse for you by aggravated misconduct like contravening WP:BLANKED. You shall leave us with only 1 recourse..Tags: UndoReverted
05:3705:37, 17 April 2021diffhist+48
Al Jazeera controversies and criticism
Undid revision 1017929952 by Fanardal (talk): Both of you and User:Edipio are required to start from WP:5P on what this project is supposed to be, & NOT TO WP:PETTIFOG. Start engaging in discussion unless you're only here for WP:ADVOCACY. And "Fanardal", you've contravened quite a lot of policies — including for user talk-pages. And "Edipio", you're also a party to the dispute — stop approving tendentious-editing, or..Tag: Undo
00:2200:22, 17 April 2021diffhist−82
User talk:103.163.124.95
None of the broadly-cited policies ask me to remain hostage to keeping that unnecessary notice, given the dialogue at the bottom of every single IP userspace. You've had your WP:WIN at the page through frail WP:PETTIFOG BUT above all, your WP:UAL — be happy! However.. That doesn't mean I shall stand getting subtle WP:THREATEN through a privacy-invading notice just because you think you're entitled to enactTag: Undo
22:0122:01, 16 April 2021diffhist0
Strike Back: Project Dawn
H:DUMMY→Critical reactions: Ahh.. I noticed now, FINALLY a good-faith argument. Sorry for not noticing the same. However.. My edit is transparently WP:MINOR & if in spite of THAT, it's not good enough for your personal-preference, then I don't care anymore. Regardless of the status, this art continues to be a low-footfall article & hence, given my life-experience: I'm not gonna waste yet-another min by escalating this to TP convo. Lest you accuse me of WP:CANVASS: You WP:WINTag: Visual edit
03:5503:55, 16 April 2021diffhist−1,836
User talk:103.163.124.95
Undid revision 1018054143 by Thewolfchild (talk): Can't platform the bad-faith laden greater-UAL editors at least here. Their era of barely-acknowledged impunity is over. ("Framban" soap-operatic drama, anyone? Drawbacks of tasking to perform *uncompensated jobs*.)
12:4812:48, 15 April 2021diffhist+1,968
Aruba Red
Fixed another set of incorrectly-marked WP:404 citations, even though these ones themselves don't sound perfect for this site — per WP:NRVE. Added the WP:STUB warning and other maintenance-tags. Any greater-UAL editor reviewing this must invest calm-mind and enough of time to go through the citations very, very, carefully. Reasons are concisely explained in a custom-communication at the WP:CLEANUP template. Based on life-experience, not gonna start a TP discuss for a low-traffic.Tags: possible unreferenced addition to BLPVisual edit
19:5819:58, 9 April 2021diffhist+2
Keith Windschuttle
→Hoax: Per the changes made at Quadrant's article. This WP:COPYWITHIN clause shouldn't have been the case but given it's very prevalent in such low-traffic articles. And while WP:WINARS is noted but the high-quality sources cited here confirm the the subject's ideological-transition having been completed since decades. Claiming it's “alleged” makes it sound like a bad-thing per MOS:ALLEGED and hence, is far more a BLP contravention.