22:4922:49, 9 September 2022diffhist+63
The Hustler
Was going to restore good faith addition of "60s film" category but since "1961 films" category is already included it seemed redundant. Adding "reason" parameter to tag might help with other issue.
22:4322:43, 9 September 2022diffhist−22
Chef (2014 film)
The purpose of the WP:SHORTDESC is to '''disambiguate''' similar titles. The guideline do not say anything about attempting to "match the article" and details such as the nationality of the production company are not only unnecessary but also push the '''short''' description beyond WP:SD40 Undid revision 1109447208 by GhostInTheMachine (talk)Tag: Undo
22:3822:38, 9 September 2022diffhist+526
Arcane (TV series)
WP:STATUSQUO The bigger point is making a better encyclopedia article, and you trying to enforce a technicality, a rule about an outdated problem that doesn't exist in this case. There's nothing wrong with the substance of what Paul Tassi is saying. Maybe you can find a better critic making the same point but deleting is not constructive.Tag: Reverted
22:1722:17, 9 September 2022diffhist+41
What Is a Woman?
There is nothing to suggest there is any consensus against including Rotten Tomatoes critics score like most film articles. (Previously there were less than 5 reviews so there was no critic score to include.) Gain consensus on Talk page if you believe editors want to actively exclude Rotten Tomatoes. Again this is the critic score which is allowed, the WP:UGC user score is not allowed.Tags: UndoReverted
21:3921:39, 9 September 2022diffhist+110
Nope (film)
Restore premise to lead section. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nope_(film)&diff=1107318464&oldid=1107317637Tag: Reverted
21:1921:19, 9 September 2022diffhist+519
Arcane (TV series)
You're totally missing the point of that rule. For a while there Forbes was including a whole load of external contributors with minimal oversight. It was never intended to exclude actual Forbes staff. Undid revision 1109423223 by Jabota gisum (talk)Tags: UndoReverted
18:4118:41, 9 September 2022diffhist−498
Predator (film)
Rephrase. Keep focus on this film. That it spawned multiple sequels is relevant because it shows how impactful this film was, other details not so important. (Reference referring to "Predator 5" was only needed before the film was released.)Tag: references removed
17:2317:23, 9 September 2022diffhist−4
Solo: A Star Wars Story
Cast section. Further copyedit because previous edit summary pointed out "They meet for the first time" that means the "sidekick" part of the description is not valid either.