17:4317:43, 13 October 2023diffhist−86
Das Fürlines
I'm not sure why this would be unconstructive. This simply removes details that are not supported by the cited source and in any event have very little relevance in an article about the band Das Fürlines.Tags: Manual revertReverted
17:3017:30, 13 October 2023diffhist+54
Mark Geragos
First of all, the pardon was not requested on January 20, 2001. That is when it was granted. The cited source was actually a dead link, but you can see from the archive that Geragos is not mentioned: https://web.archive.org/web/20030206224333/https://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/25/eveningnews/main537972.shtml The new LA Times source does mention Geragos.Tags: Manual revertReverted
18:1218:12, 11 October 2023diffhist+54
Mark Geragos
The cited source was actually a dead link, but you can see from the archive that Geragos is not mentioned: https://web.archive.org/web/20030206224333/https://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/25/eveningnews/main537972.shtml The new source does mention Geragos.Tags: Manual revertReverted
07:5307:53, 11 October 2023diffhist−86
Das Fürlines
→Aftermath: Cited source does not mention Fish and Roses, and does not mention Smith by name. It is not clear what "fellow New York City" refers to. These details are unimportant here anyway, as this article is about the band Das Fürlines..Tag: Reverted
07:3007:30, 11 October 2023diffhist+54
Mark Geragos
→Notable clients: The cited source did not mention Geragos at all. Replacing with a source which does mention him, and clarifying that the pardon was *granted* on January 20, 2001.Tag: Reverted