5 June 2023

• 22:1422:14, 5 June 2023 diff hist −4‎ Talk:Michael Hordern ‎ →‎"Better Before" is not a valid explanation for revert. Tag: Reverted
• 22:1422:14, 5 June 2023 diff hist +726‎ Talk:Michael Hordern ‎ →‎"Better Before" is not a valid explanation for revert.: Merits? Tag: Reverted
• 21:5521:55, 5 June 2023 diff hist −3‎ Michael Hordern ‎ Undid revision 1158723840 by SchroCat (talk) Undid still-unexplained revert. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 21:5221:52, 5 June 2023 diff hist +397‎ Talk:Michael Hordern ‎ →‎"Better Before" is not a valid explanation for revert.: Same old same. Tag: Reverted
• 21:3321:33, 5 June 2023 diff hist −5‎ Talk:Michael Hordern ‎ →‎"Better Before" is not a valid explanation for revert.: fixed my spelling Tag: Reverted
• 21:2821:28, 5 June 2023 diff hist −3‎ Michael Hordern ‎ Undid revision 1158716288 by SchroCat (talk) Undid arbitrary, unexplained revert. Discussion ongoing on talk page. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 21:2721:27, 5 June 2023 diff hist +905‎ Talk:Michael Hordern ‎ →‎"Better Before" is not a valid explanation for revert. Tag: Reverted
• 20:2620:26, 5 June 2023 diff hist +5‎ Talk:Michael Hordern ‎ →‎"Better Before" is not an explanation for revert. Tag: Reverted
• 20:2520:25, 5 June 2023 diff hist +364‎ Talk:Michael Hordern ‎ →‎"Better Before" is not an explanation for revert.: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
• 20:2220:22, 5 June 2023 diff hist −3‎ Michael Hordern ‎ Undid revision 1158714238 by SchroCat (talk) Undid unexplained revert Tags: Undo Reverted
• 20:2020:20, 5 June 2023 diff hist −2‎ User talk:142.105.134.196 ‎ - current
• 20:1920:19, 5 June 2023 diff hist +6‎ User talk:142.105.134.196 ‎ a
• 20:1820:18, 5 June 2023 diff hist +1‎ User talk:142.105.134.196 ‎ -
• 20:1820:18, 5 June 2023 diff hist −464‎ User talk:142.105.134.196 ‎ - Tag: Blanking
• 20:1720:17, 5 June 2023 diff hist +464‎ N User talk:142.105.134.196 ‎ -
• 19:5319:53, 5 June 2023 diff hist −3‎ Michael Hordern ‎ Undid revision 1158595198 by SchroCat (talk) Undid unexplained revert. Tags: Undo Reverted

4 June 2023

• 22:2422:24, 4 June 2023 diff hist +1‎ Michael Hordern ‎ Fixed my spelling error. Tag: Reverted
• 22:1722:17, 4 June 2023 diff hist +6‎ Michael Hordern ‎ Split connected sentence. Tag: Reverted
• 22:1422:14, 4 June 2023 diff hist −10‎ Michael Hordern ‎ What people know (especially "best know") is off topic, almost always uncitable. Revised to straightforward/encyclopedic "played". Tag: Reverted
• 22:0722:07, 4 June 2023 diff hist −29‎ Ryan O'Neal ‎ →‎1962–1963: Empire: Couldn't figure out why it was characterized as "another" except to editorialize about there being many of them (?), which is off-topic editorializing. Removed the rest of the side detail as well (about the show) as a slight off topic digression and just easier to leave out. Tag: Reverted
• 21:5721:57, 4 June 2023 diff hist −130‎ The Strongest Man in the World ‎ Removed digression. Way off topic, especially for lede. Tag: Reverted

2 June 2023

• 21:3021:30, 2 June 2023 diff hist −109‎ Vivian Vance ‎ Uncited, redundant (that she played opposite Lucy is already stated). Tag: Reverted
• 21:2421:24, 2 June 2023 diff hist −10‎ Vivian Vance ‎ What people know is off topic. Revised to straightforward "played". Split sentence. Tag: Reverted
• 21:1721:17, 2 June 2023 diff hist +3‎ William Frawley ‎ What people remember is off topic, changeable, uncitable. Revised to straightforward/encyclopedic "played". Tag: Reverted
• 21:0221:02, 2 June 2023 diff hist −13‎ Gale Gordon ‎ Tightened up. Split long sentence. Tag: Reverted
• 20:5620:56, 2 June 2023 diff hist −41‎ Gale Gordon ‎ Subjective, uncited ("respected and beloved"). What people "remember" is off topic, unencyclopedic style. Off topic digression especially in lede ("starring Eve Arden"). Tag: Reverted
• 20:4520:45, 2 June 2023 diff hist −15‎ Gale Gordon ‎ (unencyclopedic) dreamy speculation Tag: Reverted
• 20:3620:36, 2 June 2023 diff hist −48‎ Gale Gordon ‎ Fixed broken link. This new link (different page, same site) doesn't support his playing the radio version though. Tag: Reverted

26 May 2023

• 21:0821:08, 26 May 2023 diff hist −1,016‎ C.P.O. Sharkey ‎ "peripherally remembered" = self-admitted dubious notability. Way too much detail for something so "peripheral". Trimmed down, got rid of the unencyclopedic "peripherally remembered". (If a matter really *is* notable, just say (the matter) straight/confidently w/o hemming or hawing about how notable it is or isn't, include the reliable secondary source(s), and be done.)
• 20:3020:30, 26 May 2023 diff hist −118‎ Don Rickles ‎ Off-topic digression. Unencyclopedic movie-fan style. Not summarized from material in main text.
• 20:2620:26, 26 May 2023 diff hist −179‎ C.P.O. Sharkey ‎ Removed off topic digression. Unnotable, not a summary from material in main text.

20 May 2023

• 05:4005:40, 20 May 2023 diff hist −1‎ LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin ‎ extraneous comma
• 05:3905:39, 20 May 2023 diff hist +14‎ LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin ‎ split sentence into straightforward encyclopedic style (vs. magazine article style)
• 05:3405:34, 20 May 2023 diff hist −1‎ LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin ‎ →‎Design and operation: adjusted ("fixed") wonky comma usage
• 05:2705:27, 20 May 2023 diff hist −137‎ LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin ‎ →‎Forced landing in France (1929): off topic

1 February 2023

• 02:0902:09, 1 February 2023 diff hist +5‎ Cabo (game) ‎ Reverted the ambiguous "they". Is it a team that plays? Wait, it says "each player" which suggests individuals, not a group. So, "they" is confusing. I chose the original non-confusing pronoun "his or her" which is imperfect yes (because they dare imply that individual people each have a sex -- oh no!), but clarity trumps agenda here on Wikipedia.
• 01:3301:33, 1 February 2023 diff hist −14‎ Zero-knowledge proof ‎ →‎Two balls and the colour-blind friend: The "they" confusion was bigger than I thought. To be straightforward and clear, and to avoid digressive machinations, I went ahead and picked a sex for the friend and used those pronouns. I picked "Victor" as the "verifier" as in the previous example and went with it.
• 01:1301:13, 1 February 2023 diff hist +33‎ Zero-knowledge proof ‎ →‎Two balls and the colour-blind friend: Clarified ambiguity from unclear pronouns: That is, the awkward use of "they/them" to indicate immateriality of the sex of the friend while simultaneously using "they/them" to refer to the balls.