01:4901:49, 10 October 2014diffhist−65
Lawyer
copying someone else's definition is not acceptable. basic policy of the encyclopaedia is that we use our own words. non-free material only counts as fair use if no free alternative exists, which it plainly does.
23:5923:59, 9 October 2014diffhist+14
Broadway theatre
remove footnote again, for reasons already given, and finessed wording to avoid the enormously clunky "broadway theatre are"
23:4623:46, 9 October 2014diffhist−205
Jovy Marcelo
no, people do not sit around speculating about the cause of his death. rewrote in encyclopaedic tone, updated citation needed date due to the change of wording
23:4523:45, 9 October 2014diffhist−386
Guangzhou
not discussed at all in the rest of the article, so clearly not significant enough to mention in the lead
23:2723:27, 9 October 2014diffhist−9
Broadway theatre
If you were to give a reason why you want to interrupt the sentence and bury information in a footnote, that would be something we could discuss. if you deny that the interruption even exists, that's just bizarre.
13:2613:26, 9 October 2014diffhist−9
Broadway theatre
It doesn't work fine. Interrupting the article after just two words of the very first sentence is poor, poor writing. if a prior edit ignored it, it was probably because they didn't see it. what's the reason you think it needs to be buried in a footnote?
11:4011:40, 9 October 2014diffhist−330
Caliphate
"however" implies a contrast with the preceding statement, which obviously does not exist when the two statements are unrelated. Also rm final sentence which is copied directly from a source and offers no real information or enlightenment
11:3211:32, 9 October 2014diffhist−32
Salvage ethnography
copying and pasting text from sources instead of writing your own words is a copyright violation and contravenes the policies of the encyclopaedia
11:1911:19, 9 October 2014diffhist−425
Amaral (band)
citations are for material that has been or is likely to be challenged. that Amaral are a music group does not require a citation.
11:1811:18, 9 October 2014diffhist−456
Rhetorical question
the definition was given three times in the intro. one suffices. also rm statement which doesn't appear in the source given and is vague and subjective