08:2308:23, 6 July 2014diffhist−493
Eating the Blame
the fact being cited is that the episode is named after the buddhist koan. A link to the buddhist koan itself does not support that fact.
08:1208:12, 6 July 2014diffhist−26
Jeremy Spencer
it is not a fact, it is an opinion, and there is a specific proscription on reporting opinions as if they are facts.
04:5204:52, 5 July 2014diffhist−493
Eating the Blame
→Production: citations go after the facts, not after a random word in the middle of the sentence. And citations should be citations, not random links to vaguely related information
02:5302:53, 5 July 2014diffhist0
The Tall Guy
citations obviously don't go in the middle of a sentence where they just irritate the reader and break up the flow, they clearly go after the facts. This is very basic stuff and it's amazing how anyone could get it wrong
02:1302:13, 5 July 2014diffhist−1,996
Michael Fagan
rm peacock words, and this article is about this incident. If there is an article about "buckingham palace intrusions" then details of other incidents would go there. If not, they are not encyclopaedic
02:1002:10, 5 July 2014diffhist−3
Windows NT
→Naming: yeah, that's such a popular belief! me and my friends talk about it all the time! reworded more appropriately, and also put citation after the fact instead of before it
02:0702:07, 5 July 2014diffhist−584
Dave Cutler
→Personal history: 1. rm pointlessly waffly admission of uncertainty over location, adds nothing. 2. rm utterly uninteresting mention of something irrelevant that he wrote somewhere. 3. rm unsourced claim of trivial interest