01:4501:45, 1 May 2015diffhist+8
Tom Baker
stop presenting opinions as if they are facts. as you've refused to simply present facts but insist that an opinion is required, you must follow the core policy of the encyclopaedia and present it appropriately.
00:3500:35, 1 May 2015diffhist+16
Tom Baker
1. it's not a fact, it's an opinion, so followingWP:ASSERT, this is how we would have to word it. and 2. source says doctor who, not little britain. that shows how subjective the claim is, and also how dishonest you seem determined to be.
30 April 2015
11:5211:52, 30 April 2015diffhist−371
Tz database
rm subjectivity, poor writing, pointless obscuration of links, needless dating of information, verbosity