19:4519:45, 19 June 2014diffhist−1,463
City proper
Undid revision 612494213 by BsBsBs (talk) giving two differing definitions is not "nuance". If the term is "consistently misused", then define it properly, once, as is required.
05:1705:17, 11 June 2014diffhist−1,463
City proper
don't define things in two different ways, especially when one way is lifted verbatim from a source instead of written in your own words. copying like that is lazy and useless. One sensible definition suffices.
05:1405:14, 11 June 2014diffhist−394
Kenning
There is no need to say the same thing in two different ways. Just say things in the most effective way to communicate what needs to be communicated
05:1005:10, 11 June 2014diffhist−1,077
Winnie Madikizela-Mandela
rm poor tone and pov from lead, as well as junk at end which is not significant enough for a lead section and does not flow at all from previous text