04:2904:29, 23 December 2023diffhist−1,846
Multi-task learning
Removed applications because they date to the early 200's and do not reflect well modern applications. Also, there are so many applications today, almost any computer vision paper, that these appear very random and arbitraryTags: references removedVisual edit
00:3600:36, 25 February 2023diffhist+85
Christ myth theory
The sources are selectively chosen from biased Christian scholars who provide no evidence for their claims. Christ is a myth until persuasive evidence can be shown that he was real.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
00:1900:19, 25 February 2023diffhist+114
Christ myth theory
Biased Christians are vandalising this page about the mythical figure Jesus. No persuasive evidence exists and no source for their claim that the majority of scholars believe he was real is provided. Appealing to authority is unscientific anyway.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
00:0000:00, 25 February 2023diffhist+22
Christ myth theory
No source provided for the claim that the majority of scholars believe Jesus was real person. Even if true that would be irrelevant as the onus of proof is on the claimants not the refutes.Tags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
01:5601:56, 27 June 2022diffhist+61
Bra
→Etymology: likewise correcting misleading naming -- 99.999% of readers will not seek to deep-dive every link to get the correct information, nor should they be required to.
01:5201:52, 27 June 2022diffhist+67
Bra
Misleading as-is, for casual readers. More-commonly-known name added for clarity and brevity of reading.