5 September 2010

• 04:5804:58, 5 September 2010 diff hist −1‎ Gladiator (2000 film) ‎ →‎Cast

7 September 2008

• 10:0110:01, 7 September 2008 diff hist +1‎ Aston Martin DBS (2007) ‎ →‎Media coverage: 'unfortunately' is POV
• 06:2906:29, 7 September 2008 diff hist +10‎ Calendar ‎ →‎Calendar systems: 'date' seems more general than 'day', i think

4 September 2008

• 07:1407:14, 4 September 2008 diff hist +251‎ Talk:Pride-and-ego down ‎ →‎POV-section: new section
• 07:1307:13, 4 September 2008 diff hist +8‎ Pride-and-ego down ‎ →‎Clarification: whoops
• 07:1307:13, 4 September 2008 diff hist +7‎ Pride-and-ego down ‎ →‎Clarification
• 07:0407:04, 4 September 2008 diff hist −11‎ Fan Dance (exercise) ‎No edit summary

3 September 2008

• 09:4809:48, 3 September 2008 diff hist +8‎ Monopsony ‎ It it? Cite something.
• 06:5606:56, 3 September 2008 diff hist −15‎ Oligopoly ‎ It's not really incidental, is it?
• 06:5506:55, 3 September 2008 diff hist +22‎ Oligopoly ‎ →‎Description
• 06:5406:54, 3 September 2008 diff hist 0‎ Oligopoly ‎ →‎Description
• 06:5306:53, 3 September 2008 diff hist +36‎ Oligopoly ‎ →‎Description
• 06:5006:50, 3 September 2008 diff hist −2‎ Monopsony ‎ sounds like a qualitative judgment - WP:NPOV
• 06:3406:34, 3 September 2008 diff hist +226‎ Talk:Cigar ‎No edit summary
• 06:3306:33, 3 September 2008 diff hist +392‎ Talk:Cigar ‎No edit summary
• 06:3006:30, 3 September 2008 diff hist +16‎ Cigar ‎ See talk, before you remove this. Just because I am an IP does not mean I am wrong.
• 06:2706:27, 3 September 2008 diff hist +38‎ Troll A platform ‎ One cannot just claim that this is implied, without anything to back it up. I see no reason to remove this. If it is actually implied, then it does not detract from the validity of the statement.
• 06:2406:24, 3 September 2008 diff hist +8‎ Contraindication ‎ The idea is not to remove the tag until the dispute is dealt with in talk, and that has yet to occur..