22:1622:16, 8 January 2020diffhist0
Olivia Gatwood
→Personal life: Since this URL was just visited, and the information still appears at the site, we can presume it is still correct. But, this self-published is still not a good source.
22:1322:13, 8 January 2020diffhist+14
Olivia Gatwood
Thanks in advance to the ReFill team, for filling these to standard. Please use ReFill variant that gives access-date field, as well as title, etc. Cheers.
22:1222:12, 8 January 2020diffhist+339
Olivia Gatwood
Provided the sources to thre poems in the Selected section. Found the source of all the promotional information in the Career section, and since it was plagiarised, I swapped in a blockquote of the source content. It does not belong here, but having it is not as bad as hafing it and suggesting a reliable source by omitting the inline citations. Setting up other incomplete citations for checking and filling by the ReFill team. Cheers, there, thanks.
21:4721:47, 8 January 2020diffhist−251
Olivia Gatwood
→Life of the Party: Copy edit, punctuation, and checking source. First source was to a song lyrics cite, and was removed. Second sentence checks to source, but is incomplete, and so was setup for filling by ReFill.Tag: references removed
21:4221:42, 8 January 2020diffhist+382
Olivia Gatwood
→New American Best Friend: Copy edited section (removing "ones one" for instance), and noted the recurring violations of WP:VERIFY. Please, this artist is due the respect, of creating and maintaining an encyclopedic article.Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
21:3221:32, 8 January 2020diffhist+187
Olivia Gatwood
→Podcast: Added the fact that as of end of 2019, it was still going, and had reached 40th episode. However, the rest violates WP:OR, because it is publishing user exprience, rather than citing sources. (There is no mention of the podcast format or the depth of their relationship at the cited source.)
21:2321:23, 8 January 2020diffhist+1,160
Olivia Gatwood
Removed unreliable source tag. Began to standardise/normalise citn content, styles. Corrected various sentences to appended citns. DID dozen COPY EDITS, placed copy edit tag expert will review. Noted all infobox, much lead information still unsourced. Next, bust.com article does not state that debut work received positive reviews, it simply mentions book, its sales. Hence, this citn moved to Further reading, sentence labeled with ((cn))—since "reviews" mentioned in plural, needs ≥3 sourcesTag: references removed
20:3920:39, 8 January 2020diffhist+1,905
Baloxavir marboxil
Corrected issue with Shionogi numbers in drugbox. Added a resistance sentence to the lead, because this is what everyone doing research on this is talking about. Added further discovery chemistry information, including the fact that the onmarket drug is a prodrug (as well as the compounds abbreviations and synonyms that appear in its many publications).
19:5119:51, 8 January 2020diffhist+20
EGLN1
I chose this tag over the one that would have described this as a review of primary literature, but either of these would be accurate. We are interpretting the primary research literature, which was not the intended role of WP, per its founders and founding generation. We are supposed to report the preponderance of scientific opinion from secondary sources, see sections of WP:VERIFY.
18:5018:50, 8 January 2020diffhist+23
Roche
→Products: this list, by its nature, is inaccurate. To allow editors and readers no recourse to verify content violates WP:VERIFY.
18:4518:45, 8 January 2020diffhist+2,512
Baloxavir marboxil
Added Chemistry section. Moved the Resistance section to the point in the article below the Side effects section (because of the preeminence of adverse events data in drug approval). Moved the clinical trial content from the Medical uses section to the Approvals section, for editing or replacement by the alternative material (see Talk). Even if the blockquote is added, this pre-existing material needs to be integrated.
18:0318:03, 8 January 2020diffhist+251
Baloxavir marboxil
→Approval: Since approvals listed include Japan, the opening sentence was edited to include the JMHLW. The use of these two trials for the Japanese approval needs to be confirmed, hence the tag.
17:0517:05, 8 January 2020diffhist−14
Baloxavir marboxil
Undid revision 934812540 by Whywhenwhohow (talk) THis is a misuse of the PD notice, to justify plagiarism. PD material cannot be cut and pasted in without editing. Even if such plagiarism is widespread elsewhere in Wikipedia, it is not, in the Wikiproject Medicine, and should not begin. Paraphrase or quote material if you want it in. Verbatim use is plagiarism—look at examples at WP:PLARIARISM. Engage at Doc James Talk page.Tag: Undo
17:0117:01, 8 January 2020diffhist−1,774
Baloxavir marboxil
Undid revision 934812453 by Whywhenwhohow (talk) PLEASE STOP EDDIT WARRING, AND ENGAGE IN THE DISCUSSION AT THE TALK PAGE OF DOC JAMES. DO NOT REVERT AGAIN UNTIL YOU GET FURTHER ADVICE. Yes, you are allowed to summarise public domain material; but you are not allowed to use it verbatim—i.e., you are not allowed to cut and paste sentences, unchanged, and present them as your own choice and ordering of words. Quote/praphrase it!Tag: Undo
16:5216:52, 8 January 2020diffhist−1,774
Baloxavir marboxil
Undid revision 934811137 by Whywhenwhohow (talk) You misunderstand—public domain does not mean material can be plagiarised, and used without paraphrasing or quoting. PLEASE, enter into discussion at Doc James Talk page, and do not continue to edit war.Tag: Undo
16:4016:40, 8 January 2020diffhist−1,774
Baloxavir marboxil
Removing plagiarism. It would have been a good edit, but the material drawn was used verbatim, without quotation marks, and so is being moved to Talk. One sentence was integrated, and so with the paraphrase, allows retention of the source, as a placeholder for the other material to be returned, either as a blockquote, or a clear, strong paraphrase.