18:1018:10, 12 December 2015diffhist+5,197
User talk:GamerPro64
→arbReport questions: goal for the email-batch is to have at least 10 responses, so that the averaging-process (example given) will anonymize the data provided to us. since we don't have 10 yet, we can wait a bit longer, or mix in some on-wiki data.
16:2816:28, 11 December 2015diffhist+4,378
User talk:GamerPro64
→Signpost spam: thanks to boing and czar and samtar ... but I basically agree with floq now ... and wish I'd thunk of it properly before , but WP:TIAD was pressing heavily upon us when we organized. That's no excuse though, o'course.
14:5314:53, 10 December 2015diffhist−380
PubNub
remove forbes.com ref as non-WP:RS, because in this case, it is forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv which is a zero-editorial-oversight WP:BLOGS. "Opinions expressed by Contributors are their own" can add back iff Janakiram MSV is IT authority
23:2823:28, 9 December 2015diffhist+1,270
User talk:Corinne
→The questionnaire: adding corinne-dataset into the batch , plus some comments about may-or-may-not-be-the-old-saying , an optimally-memorable wiki-name , and the proposal to implement thanks-for-anons does exist but has not yet passed , artist-empire
18:3818:38, 9 December 2015diffhist+1,265
User talk:Corinne
→Signpost exit poll: usernames won't be attached to numeric && alphabetic responses. if we use a quoted-comment from your response, we will check with you first. tho since your answers are on-wiki at your usertalk, they are web-visible, of course.
18:1018:10, 9 December 2015diffhist+332
User talk:GamerPro64
→Signpost spam: likely origin , circa November 29th ... may also have come up elsewhere though? I've already apologized to Ryk72 for getting them in hot water, and the same sentiment goes to Gamer: sorry this didn't turn out as well as intended
15:1515:15, 9 December 2015diffhist+1,182
User talk:Nathan
→Signpost exit poll: note about objectives ... I did have an ulterior motive for question seven , about who should run in the next arbcom election , but otherwise I think the poll-data (and the vote-data) will show mass-message was a win overall.