01:1801:18, 24 May 2020diffhist−24
Alex Jones
calling someone fake news with no proof is an onion no extra people need to be involved you inject opinion in what is supposed to be a fact based article.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
01:1501:15, 24 May 2020diffhist−24
Alex Jones
You have provided no proof he is far right.. He is an accused conspiracy theroristTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
01:1101:11, 24 May 2020diffhist−22
Alex Jones
If one is a conspiracy therorist then be that but to also claim fake news as well. You are either none or one you cannot be both. A decision must be made as even a website such as vice was pointed out to be fake news by facebook.. Or prager u for example. The very definition of calling someone fake news or a conspiracy theorist is based on opinion. Just as hate speech is an opinion. It all depends on what side of the coin you are on. CNN is fake news to Trump supporters as is fox news is russ...Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
01:0001:00, 24 May 2020diffhist−37
Alex Jones
reading the talk page rant we see no proof that he is far right sources proving this should be provided. I would also add conspiracy theorist is a bit of a stretch based on an opinion article. This should be looked into as it is an opinion. Opinions should not be included in wikipedia articles. If opinions are to be added they should be in a separate place. As to allow others to diagnose this I did not take out this reference as of yet.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit