19 June 2010
- 12:0812:08, 19 June 2010 diff hist +115 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the spirit of fairness and balance, you should seek to find a middle ground, I proposed a new wording, if you can think of a better compromise, go ahead, but censorship is wrong
- 11:4111:41, 19 June 2010 diff hist +115 Deepwater Horizon oil spill ok, this time I made more neutral language, so that all view points are taken into account, hopefully this clears up any misunderstanding and is ok for the wiki rules
- 10:3710:37, 19 June 2010 diff hist +149 Deepwater Horizon oil spill ok, yes, thats what RVV means. However, dont mix apples and oranges, the blowout caused the spill yes, but what caused the blowout? the source makes that clear, you need to look at whole picture, ty!!
- 10:1410:14, 19 June 2010 diff hist +149 Deepwater Horizon oil spill rvv - yes, the EU Times is indeed a RS! Please see the talk page for an explanation.
- 10:1110:11, 19 June 2010 diff hist +789 Talk:Deepwater Horizon oil spill →The EU Times is reliable source!: new section
- 08:5708:57, 19 June 2010 diff hist +149 Deepwater Horizon oil spill verified source
- 08:2908:29, 19 June 2010 diff hist +149 Deepwater Horizon oil spill No edit summary
 | This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |