Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

21:5421:54, 11 January 2024 diff hist +35‎ Draft:Chris Smith (Teacher) ‎No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
21:5021:50, 11 January 2024 diff hist +353‎ Draft:Chris Smith (Teacher) ‎No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

20:1620:16, 20 August 2023 diff hist +1‎ Kilmarnock Academy ‎ The fact about Kilmarnock Academy being the only Scottish school to have two Nobel prize winners is now out of date (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-63800240)

09:5009:50, 16 March 2023 diff hist −9‎ Grange Academy, Kilmarnock ‎ Removed Wallace (no longer a house at Grange). Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

08:4108:41, 1 July 2022 diff hist −4‎ m Grange Academy, Kilmarnock ‎ spelling correction "Scotty" to "Scott"<ref>https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/ayrshire/huge-changes-ayrshire-academies-head-26380517</ref>
08:4008:40, 1 July 2022 diff hist −1‎ m Grange Academy, Kilmarnock ‎ spelling correction "Scotty" to "Scott"<ref>https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/ayrshire/huge-changes-ayrshire-academies-head-26380517</ref>

06:0006:00, 20 May 2022 diff hist −1‎ Grange Academy, Kilmarnock ‎ spelling correction: "animmo" to "animo"

13:3013:30, 12 November 2021 diff hist +570‎ Grange Academy, Kilmarnock ‎ A former student picked up a significant award so added her to the Notable Former Students section.

13:5213:52, 12 October 2020 diff hist −1‎ m In My Life ‎ The report cited actually states a probability of 0.018 (NOT 0.018% as previously appeared on the Wikipedia article). As it turns out, I had a discussion with Prof Keith Devlin today (who is the one quoted in that report) and he says that he thinks that this should have read 0.18 anyway (tying up closer with the 18.9% from the original MIT paper).