10:1610:16, 7 November 2009diffhist+1,149
Banja Luka
You are right, it is not contraversial at all. That source you like so much is pure fabrication&propaganda. Btw, from the ICTY verdict there are several such quotes. Hardly 'out of context'. See BoD.
17:5917:59, 6 November 2009diffhist+1,318
Bosnian War
This is highly referenced pragraph with direct citations from documents of ICJ, CIA factbook and Deyton Accords. Nirvana70 and proven fabricator Robo-linker consider it is POV.
17:5317:53, 6 November 2009diffhist+923
Bosnian War
[Nirvana70] and proven fabricationist [Robot-linker] push together for the same propaganda, bias and lies. The whole aritcle is under constant control of this group.
15:4915:49, 31 October 2009diffhist+3,898
Banja Luka
PRODY, you did not even read the edit, just pressed undo, as I thought. You are not even trying to present the complete picture. Typical propagandist. FYI twelve babies is a real sad event.
10:2910:29, 31 October 2009diffhist+3,641
Banja Luka
Now its better. Referenced text restored, references added and bias removed. Lazy propagandists bon appétit!
19:4619:46, 30 October 2009diffhist−1,018
Banja Luka
This is ancient news. Indications about police/government involvement have proven wrong. Ferhadija is now almost finished with rebuilding and looking like before.
19:3919:39, 30 October 2009diffhist+431
Banja Luka
Text Robo is pushing for is heavilly bias, partial and one sided. This version with imputs from 20 and robo could be something we can work with.
19:1819:18, 30 October 2009diffhist+206
Banja Luka
War in Yu is the framework. RS if founded on Jan/09-1992 and B&H decalration came later. Banja Luka gradually gained status of the capital from Serbian Sarajevo. Those are easily referenced facts. OK?
18:4618:46, 30 October 2009diffhist+41
Banja Luka
Typos / Robo, this behavior of yours resembles one of an elephant in a china shop! Take care not to destroy the article in a battle to enforce your opinions.
10:3710:37, 29 October 2009diffhist+211
Banja Luka
Tweety, that's closer to the truth. Just to add some more facts for better understanding of the situation in Banja Luka.
28 October 2009
16:3616:36, 28 October 2009diffhist+1,250
Banja Luka
The paragraph you left is extreemly bias, thus it provides false and incorrect image of the events, which is absolutelly uneccaptable.
00:1700:17, 28 October 2009diffhist+686
Bosnian War
Nirva and Robo, of course that you can not find sources for your propaganda, while deleting my edits referenced to ICJ, Dayton Accords, ICTY and CIA - with citations.
27 October 2009
23:1823:18, 27 October 2009diffhist+1,880
Banja Luka
Check the Constitution at the time and see for yourself if B&H separation referendum was legal. It was not, as it was in direct opposition to the Articles 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the Constitution.
15:5815:58, 24 October 2009diffhist+473
Bosnian War
In ICJ's decision the only caracterization of the nature of the Bosnian war is that it's been "fratricidal war in Bosnia and Herzegovina." (http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/91/13687.pdf)
23:3223:32, 11 September 2009diffhist+1,472
Banja Luka
The monastery in Petricevac is not from 1378, but from much later date. Although t is possible that a Franciscan monastery was somewhere around Banja Luka at the time.