21:0821:08, 2 March 2023diffhist−1,750
Big Six (law firms)
@aukusruckus, not sure why this page continues to be heavily edited, removing information that finds considerable support from authoritative and independent sources. Please see the various sources cited supporting the information in this version. Page is being watched for future edits.Tags: Manual revertVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
26 February 2023
13:1813:18, 26 February 2023diffhist−1,284
Big Six (law firms)
WP: REVERTED. Previous edit inconsistent with the numerous independent and recent citations of this version. The sources cited herein are from leading Australian newspapers and industry sources. The previous edit seems to have removed them for some inexplicable reason, preferring to rely on outdated sources which are not relevant or even accurate in recent time. Watching this page.Tags: Manual revertRevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
11:4611:46, 25 October 2021diffhist+358 m
Big Six (law firms)
Unsure why previous edit referred to this as subject to debate. Included another citation from legal newspaper of Australia (now overall several citations) that support the view as conclusive.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
14:4014:40, 16 July 2021diffhist+272 m
Big Six (law firms)
Added recent 2021 citation that discusses, although tangentially, the composition of the top tier law firms in Australia as the 8 law firms listed in this wiki articleTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
14:2514:25, 16 July 2021diffhist−129 m
Big Six (law firms)
Heading change for consistency with previous identification and usage of term. Also beginning sentence of paragraph removed as superfluous.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit