20:0020:00, 16 January 2024diffhist+593
SpaceX Starship
→Space exploration: Synth doesn't mean you can't use existing data to reinforce a thesis already made in an RS. We should have more than one example of what launch costs of normal NASA missions are. I added JUNO instead. You have an issue, take it to the talk page please.Tag: Visual edit
19:3019:30, 16 January 2024diffhist−74
SpaceX Starship
→Raptor engine: Everyday astronaut is not a reliable source. The optimal ratio isn't the stoichemetric ratio; that's what the text currently implies though by saying you could get more performance by operating at 4:1. You can't. Use CEARUN.Tag: Visual edit
15 January 2024
21:1121:11, 15 January 2024diffhist−268
SpaceX Starship
→Starship spacecraft: That's not true though... operating at 3.6:1 is close to optimal for ISP. Fuel rich means the exhaust products have a lower molecular weight, meaning the exhaust ends up being faster. Moreover the source quoted isn't an RS, it's just more of "Musk said this".Tags: RevertedVisual edit
03:4503:45, 12 January 2024diffhist+719
SpaceX Starship
Per WP:MOS :"and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies.". We have a lot about the environmental controversy now, there's been literally dozens of RS's about it, it absolutely needs to be in the lede if we're planning on ever getting this back on the GA list.Tag: Visual edit