06:4206:42, 7 March 2007diffhist−21,043
Joachim Hoffmann
hate speech, which actually has little to do with hoffmann should certainly be deleted. even the intro was littered with POV terms like ''anti-russian'' and even ''holocaust denial''
09:4709:47, 6 March 2007diffhist−14,940
Talk:Joachim Hoffmann
rv. wikipedia not a soapbox. possible copyvio; IP himself admitted he hasn't read a single book by the author he is opposed to. biased anti-hoffmann propaganda can't even make up a criticism section
09:4109:41, 6 March 2007diffhist−19,257
Joachim Hoffmann
ungrammatical slander like ''associated most closely with virulent anti-soviet and anti-russian oriented theories of holocaust denial'' has nothing to do in a would-be-encyclopedia
11:0611:06, 3 March 2007diffhist−4,331
Joachim Hoffmann
actually, i'll still revert. the style in the intro - had been written by other users - was completely destroyed by an IP user. even UNCAPITALISED letters etc. a schoolboy having fun??
11:0411:04, 3 March 2007diffhist−6,514
Joachim Hoffmann
why should 75% of the article cover other historians and their works and ideas??? please compare german wikipedia, where it was finally found out (!?) that hoffmann should not be called hol. denier
09:1509:15, 2 March 2007diffhist−8,938
Joachim Hoffmann
the edits by an anonymous user do not cover hoffmann's life and work, but those who might have had minor connexions with the author. also ''wikipedia article says'' is to be avoided