17:1617:16, 5 February 2022diffhist−227
Furry fandom
→Zoophilia: That is not at all what the paper says. 50% picked "0" on a scale of 0 to 10. That does not mean that the other 50% are all attracted to real animals, as is implied here. That's not how 0-10 scales work.
11:1511:15, 13 November 2021diffhist−400
Furry fandom
The article does not mention this topic at all. Also, one example cannot be used to create a general "belief" that people supposedly hold.
9 August 2021
13:3513:35, 9 August 2021diffhist−212
Furry fandom
→Sexual aspects: The MLP fandom is decidedly *not* a subsection of the furry fandom, so it seems inappropriate to use that example here. There's a reason the two fandoms use entirely separate terminologies for all these things.Tag: Manual revert
20:3720:37, 4 July 2019diffhist−65
Cole L. Blease
That's not true, according to the source. The quote is used to justify lynching, not illegal entry into the US. Not that it makes the quote any better, but it's clearly wrong here.
07:5207:52, 28 June 2019diffhist0
Chernobyl disaster
→Сancer assessments: What even is an "ultra" anti-nuclear organization? Unnecessary editorializing. Also, neither source nor article say anything about the organization being anti-nuclear energy (rather than anti-nuclear war).
18:2918:29, 1 July 2018diffhist−207
Peter Zeihan
What does that even mean? Collecting author's works is the very job of a library. It might be noteworthy if no library had his books, but not the other way around.
19:0319:03, 21 March 2016diffhist−56
The Simpsons
Removing Sci-fi category. The show has parodied just about every genre imaginable. That does not mean that the show belongs in every genre category imaginable.
18:3018:30, 2 October 2014diffhist−4
Furry fandom
Yes, and there was a very good reason for this. "fursuitism" is a neologism that was used in one single article. "fursuiting" is the actual term the sentence is talkingabout.