04:5804:58, 3 May 2024diffhist−333
Research paper mill
focus on miRNAs inappropriate. in the science.org ref, ~34% of neurosci papers estimated to be plagiarized/paper mills. By comparison the new ref added in last edits gives no stat, but just has a paragraph saying "substantial" with no reference to support this. The article topic in Nuc Res is not on paper mills either. Returned to earlier version.Tag: Visual edit
16:4016:40, 3 February 2024diffhist+26
Reproducibility
→Terminology: Removed biased phrasing that suggested an objective correct definition in the very same sentence that acknowledged a legitimate debate over the usage and definition of reproducibility. Edited to be consistent with the framing presented in the header of the article.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
07:4607:46, 6 December 2023diffhist−20
ELife
Undid revision 1188469130 by 131.94.186.73 (talk) - I understand the intent, but it's simply untrue that eLife doesn't publish peer-reviewed things, as they explicitly coordinate peer review and only publish peer-reviewed manuscripts. eLife's model simply doesn't provide a binary yes/no endorsement, but still adds an editor's stated endorsement to articles. Former wording more clear, but I changed "journal" to "publisher."
4 December 2023
09:2909:29, 4 December 2023diffhist+2,177
Timeline of immunology
Added discoveries relating to insects: 1) Boman 1972 revealing invertebrates had immune systems. 2) Discovery of the first animal antimicrobial peptide. 3) Discovery of Imd signalling, and added reference to Toll-like receptors section from 1996-1998, which were first discovered in Drosophila in 1996 and then later extrapolated to mammals after this.Tag: Visual edit
20:1820:18, 25 October 2023diffhist−996
ELife
Changed article for tone and WP:DUE concerns. Of note, prominent biologists being cited is not objective (cherrypicking), as one could just as easily cite prominent biologists demanding his resignation (e.g. Oded Rechavi). Removed this part and cleaned up section. Merged controversy part of the Oct 2022 announcement to a section titled Controversial decisions, so as to avoid having a main-title section devoted just to Eisen's firing (with heading lacking context on what the controversy was).Tag: Visual edit
07:1907:19, 3 October 2023diffhist−133
MDPI
Edits: 1) Hanson et al data use only articles indexed in both WoS and Scopus, not total articles. 2) 88% (Table 2).