22:3622:36, 4 October 2014diffhist−14,282
John Gee
not really that prominent - pretty obscure actually - and are we really listing out every single paper he ever wrote?
23:1023:10, 23 June 2013diffhist−189
Kolob
Everything related to Mormonism is a topic of conversation with critics - this sentence is unnecessary - also it is a stretch to say it is "rarely" a topic discussion, I have heard this talked about many times in church
05:5505:55, 18 June 2013diffhist−1,946
Samuel the Lamanite
→Prophecies: No need to go into such gory detail - there is as much wording here as the actual verses in the BOM - let the reader go to the BOM - the table is a really good summary
05:4605:46, 18 June 2013diffhist−323
Samuel the Lamanite
→Prophecies: This paragraph is incomprehensible - I only know what they are talking about because I have read this part of the BOM, I imagine everyone else would be dizzy with confusion
05:3005:30, 18 June 2013diffhist−4,279
Zarahemla
→Local setting: Sorry - this is not salvageable - it is completely speculative, and all of it is original research - the only outside reference is to a fringe Mormon website that is equally as speculative - let's get some real scholars to back this up
05:2805:28, 18 June 2013diffhist−402
Zarahemla
There is so much original research here my head is spinning - how has this survived for so long as a valid WP entry?
05:2105:21, 18 June 2013diffhist−309
Zarahemla
→Story: these aren't citations about what people say, this is original research with just a bunch of references to Mormon scripture
05:1905:19, 18 June 2013diffhist−218
Zarahemla
→Story: Not sure how stone vs. wood is relevant - also the "exaggerated" setting? Weasel word. Also - it wasn't some mormons, it was JS himself
05:1105:11, 18 June 2013diffhist−625
Zarahemla
New section - and removing a pretty ridiculous paragraph in my opinion - completely speculative and the single reference is pretty suspect as well - let's get some independent research referenced here guys