2 December 2023
- 03:2103:21, 2 December 2023 diff hist −5 m Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Feedback →False Claim in Ballot Instructions and Remedy
- 03:1903:19, 2 December 2023 diff hist +186 Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Feedback →False Claim in Ballot Instructions and Remedy: Reply Tag: Reply
1 December 2023
- 09:1209:12, 1 December 2023 diff hist −202 Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Feedback →False Claim in Ballot Instructions and Remedy: shorter
- 08:4508:45, 1 December 2023 diff hist −5 m Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Feedback →False Claim in Ballot Instructions and Remedy
- 07:1907:19, 1 December 2023 diff hist +4 m Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Feedback →False Claim in Ballot Instructions and Remedy
- 07:1907:19, 1 December 2023 diff hist +14 m Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Feedback →False Claim in Ballot Instructions and Remedy
- 07:1107:11, 1 December 2023 diff hist +5,346 Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Feedback →False Claim in Ballot Instructions and Remedy: new section Tag: New topic
23 February 2023
- 08:4008:40, 23 February 2023 diff hist +1 m Strategic voting →Types of strategic voting: correct preposition I believe
- 08:3908:39, 23 February 2023 diff hist +3 m Strategic voting →Types of strategic voting: "electoral system" now used in wiki and I think better encapsulates two round systems etc.
- 08:3408:34, 23 February 2023 diff hist −19 Strategic voting →Types of strategic voting: Mischief voting is indistinguishable from insincere, tactical, or strategic voting. It's clutter that detracts from the clear, descriptive "pushover."
- 08:2908:29, 23 February 2023 diff hist −1 m Strategic voting →Types of strategic voting: This grammar reads correct to me without 2nd comma. We might remove the 1st in the sentence as well.
- 08:2508:25, 23 February 2023 diff hist 0 Strategic voting →Types of strategic voting: "undesirable" less vague and clearer I think (removed "unpreferred"—is that a word?)
- 08:2208:22, 23 February 2023 diff hist +167 Strategic voting distinguishing feature is voting weak candidate above hopeful + hopeful can be unranked + state goal rather than what it isn't
1 February 2023
- 08:4908:49, 1 February 2023 diff hist +1,341 User talk:Filingpro →This edit inserts a false claim.: Reply Tag: Reply
31 January 2023
- 19:0019:00, 31 January 2023 diff hist +1,868 User talk:Filingpro →This edit inserts a false claim.: Reply Tag: Reply
30 January 2023
- 17:0017:00, 30 January 2023 diff hist +206 User talk:Filingpro →This edit inserts a false claim.
- 05:2405:24, 30 January 2023 diff hist −8 2009 Burlington mayoral election concrete "voters" clearer I think than abstract "electorate" in this case and simpler word while I don't see a need or benefit to the abstract word Tag: Reverted
- 05:2105:21, 30 January 2023 diff hist −12 2009 Burlington mayoral election The colon seemed incorrect punctuation. I don't know what "in any case" adds and seems to detract from the clear meaning of the sentence. If added back please provide a reason.Thx. Tag: Reverted
- 05:1705:17, 30 January 2023 diff hist +2 2009 Burlington mayoral election The correct verb tense to my ear. I think the problem was "can be deduced" at the start of the paragraph establishes present tense. Tag: Reverted
- 05:1405:14, 30 January 2023 diff hist +107 2009 Burlington mayoral election generalized statement about IRV non-manipulability that doesn't depend on context of Burlington election Tag: Reverted
21 December 2022
- 13:2613:26, 21 December 2022 diff hist +25 Electoral system clarifying to reader what is actually going on; breaking two large, separate ideas into separate sentences
29 September 2021
- 18:5018:50, 29 September 2021 diff hist +1 m Talk:Majoritarianism →Error re: Majoritarian Electoral System?
- 18:4918:49, 29 September 2021 diff hist +972 Talk:Majoritarianism →Error re: Majoritarian Electoral System?: new section
- 01:4601:46, 29 September 2021 diff hist +1,518 Talk:Electoral system →Source For Plurality Used In Majoritarian Systems?: Suggested fixes for Majoritarian section
28 September 2021
- 21:5621:56, 28 September 2021 diff hist +1 m Condorcet method →Potential for tactical voting: typo: plural required
- 21:5521:55, 28 September 2021 diff hist +117 Condorcet method →Potential for tactical voting: "somewhat" was vague
27 September 2021
- 09:5409:54, 27 September 2021 diff hist +381 Talk:Electoral system →Source For Plurality Used In Majoritarian Systems?: new section
- 09:3909:39, 27 September 2021 diff hist +65 Electoral system →Majoritarian systems: replaced "single round" with "single election" because IRV has multiple rounds, not just one
- 09:2609:26, 27 September 2021 diff hist −66 Electoral system →Majoritarian systems: "some cases" vague I think in this context; seems the "plurality" exception can be and is mentioned separately in article, but not opening sentence
- 09:1109:11, 27 September 2021 diff hist −6 Electoral system →Majoritarian systems: only one candidate can win a majority therefore using singular
- 08:5708:57, 27 September 2021 diff hist +6 Electoral system word "preferential" better suited to context than "ranked" and its a synonym, as noted in opening of the linked article
- 08:3408:34, 27 September 2021 diff hist −3 Electoral system "race" is a simple word commonly used in context of elections
- 08:2308:23, 27 September 2021 diff hist +7 Electoral system help educate reader with cross-links: candidate, legislature, political party
- 08:0408:04, 27 September 2021 diff hist −31 Electoral system keeping a long sentence as simple as possible—feel free to add back "alliance" if necessary detail, although I think simpler is preferable in intro
- 04:4804:48, 27 September 2021 diff hist +1 Approval voting demonstrate a gradient cardinal preference rather than dichotomous one
- 04:2904:29, 27 September 2021 diff hist −12 Approval voting dichotomous cutoff redundant (removed dichotomous)
- 04:2304:23, 27 September 2021 diff hist −12 Approval voting dichotomous cutoff redundant (removed dichotomous)
- 04:1604:16, 27 September 2021 diff hist +433 Approval voting Clearer, simpler explanation, with specific failure case given, thereby alleviating need for citation.
26 September 2021
- 21:5021:50, 26 September 2021 diff hist −5 Constituent No edit summary Tag: Disambiguation links added
- 18:2718:27, 26 September 2021 diff hist +53 Constituent →In politics
25 September 2021
- 01:4401:44, 25 September 2021 diff hist −52 Constituent combined first two bullets which were redundant
- 01:3101:31, 25 September 2021 diff hist +34 Electoral system gives context for the sentence and transitions from prior sentence; provides helpful background for the graphic chart on right
24 September 2021
- 08:1408:14, 24 September 2021 diff hist −54 Electoral system "global preference of the community" was vague; PR and plurality references not necessary because ranked voting already specified; Arrow is about spoilers
- 07:4607:46, 24 September 2021 diff hist +240 Electoral system Two critical aspects of electoral systems are: 1. determining constituencies and 2. direct vs. indirect representation; therefore included in introduction
31 March 2020
- 23:3823:38, 31 March 2020 diff hist +105 Talk:Later-no-harm criterion →Bullet Voting & Significance of Failure in Intro. (Reasons For Reinstatement)
- 08:3608:36, 31 March 2020 diff hist +1 Talk:Later-no-harm criterion →Bullet Voting & Significance of Failure in Intro. (Reasons For Reinstatement)
- 08:3508:35, 31 March 2020 diff hist +1,184 Talk:Later-no-harm criterion →Bullet Voting & Significance of Failure in Intro. (Reasons For Reinstatement): new section
- 08:3208:32, 31 March 2020 diff hist +188 Later-no-harm criterion Please see talk page “Bullet Voting & Significance of Failure in Intro. (Reasons For Reinstatement)”
- 08:2408:24, 31 March 2020 diff hist −19 Later-no-help criterion less wordy - clarified "can not" cause
6 March 2020
- 01:0201:02, 6 March 2020 diff hist +223 2009 Burlington mayoral election →Hypothetical results under various voting systems: I think it improves the article to educate the reader on how tactical voting can change ballots given this section is a direct comparison against IRV specifically and therefore a mere general reference to tactical voting is inadequate, if not misleading
