3 November 2023
- 12:5912:59, 3 November 2023 diff hist −7 m User:Fuzzypeg/Userboxes/Occult history Revert broken grammar current
2 September 2022
- 13:3413:34, 2 September 2022 diff hist +619 Talk:Autumn →"Traditionally": new section Tag: New topic
20 January 2022
- 05:3705:37, 20 January 2022 diff hist +336 Talk:Ukraine →What's happening in Ukraine?: new section
3 August 2021
- 12:2612:26, 3 August 2021 diff hist +8 Tonsil Undid revision 1036109785 by 50.93.149.10 (talk): Unexplained deletion of " organs ", resulting in bad grammar and formatting. Tag: Undo
6 July 2021
- 03:2103:21, 6 July 2021 diff hist +630 Talk:Shem HaMephorash →RfC: Should the Angels of the Shem Hamephorash table be kept or deleted?: Goetia is not the umbrella category for occultism and Christian Kabbalah
- 02:5602:56, 6 July 2021 diff hist +1,396 Talk:Shem HaMephorash →RfC: Should the Angels of the Shem Hamephorash table be kept or deleted?: Keep: my thoughts.
- 02:4602:46, 6 July 2021 diff hist +3,672 Talk:Shem HaMephorash →Table of angels and demons: The Sefer ha-Bahir first explained the method of the 72-fold name; and these names passed quickly into Christian use.
- 01:1101:11, 6 July 2021 diff hist +378 Shem HaMephorash →The 72-fold name: Expand slightly on Reuchlin's conception of 72-fold name
- 00:3800:38, 6 July 2021 diff hist +1,015 Talk:Shem HaMephorash →Discussion about whether to include the table listing the "angels of the Shem Hamephorash": Johannes Reuchlin a source for the 72 angelic names.
23 July 2020
- 10:2110:21, 23 July 2020 diff hist −505 Talk:Historically informed performance →Whole Beat Metronome Practice: Simplifying comment and removing the small list of sources, since we already have the list at Talk:Metronome, and it doesn't make sense to maintain two lists and two discussions.
- 10:0810:08, 23 July 2020 diff hist +149 Talk:Metronome →Whole Beat Metronome Practice: Another source on the subject
- 00:0800:08, 23 July 2020 diff hist −238 Case fatality rate Removing misleading video (see talk). I've also posted a comment on the media file's Commons talk page, explaining why it is misleading. I hope the video will be revised and re-added, as it's good in other respects.
22 July 2020
- 23:5423:54, 22 July 2020 diff hist +507 Talk:Case fatality rate →CFR definition
1 July 2020
- 01:0701:07, 1 July 2020 diff hist +157 Talk:Metronome →Whole Beat Metronome Practice: I've made the same suggestion at Talk:Historically informed performance
- 01:0401:04, 1 July 2020 diff hist +2,216 Talk:Historically informed performance →Whole Beat Metronome Practice: new section
30 June 2020
- 23:5123:51, 30 June 2020 diff hist +2,109 Talk:Metronome →Whole Beat Metronome Practice: new section
27 June 2020
- 12:5812:58, 27 June 2020 diff hist 0 m User:Fuzzypeg/Userboxes/Hel Remove green border around image
16 June 2020
- 12:3012:30, 16 June 2020 diff hist +72 Minor Arcana →Symbolism: The cited source actually says swords and wands are considered by some to be fire and air respectively. Also, moving the citation to a location where it's clearer that it refers to the whole table.
- 12:1312:13, 16 June 2020 diff hist +15 Tarot card reading →History: Mention when the sermon was
4 May 2020
- 06:4006:40, 4 May 2020 diff hist +2,634 Talk:Ozone therapy →COVID-19 section: Thanks, I now understand WP:MEDRS better. Also listing some current clinical trials on talk page for future reference.
28 April 2020
- 00:1400:14, 28 April 2020 diff hist −1 m Ozone therapy →Proposed uses: Remove stray comma
- 00:1200:12, 28 April 2020 diff hist −6 m User talk:Chris Capoccia →/* Ozone therapy: */ Whoops! I formatted that heading as a C programming comment! Too much context-switching!
- 00:1000:10, 28 April 2020 diff hist +276 User talk:Chris Capoccia →/* Ozone therapy: */ new section
- 00:0600:06, 28 April 2020 diff hist +88 Talk:Ozone therapy →COVID-19 section: Clarify I'm still not keen on words "claim" and "anecdotal"
- 00:0000:00, 28 April 2020 diff hist +904 Talk:Ozone therapy →COVID-19 section: Unreferenced statement about hospitals being in "the ozone therapy community" needs fixing or removing.
27 April 2020
- 23:4723:47, 27 April 2020 diff hist +1,807 Talk:Ozone therapy →COVID-19 section: Please assume good faith; also discussing what constitutes "evidence". There is no reason to believe these researchers are incompetent to produce high quality evidence, given ethics approval.
- 16:0016:00, 27 April 2020 diff hist +17 m Talk:Ozone therapy →COVID-19 section: clarify
- 15:5815:58, 27 April 2020 diff hist +1,811 Talk:Ozone therapy →COVID-19 section: Adding explanation of my edits.
- 15:2715:27, 27 April 2020 diff hist +60 Ozone therapy →Use in treating COVID-19: More info about rigorous trials, avoiding inaccurate description ("anecdotal") and weasel words ("claims").
- 14:5714:57, 27 April 2020 diff hist +303 Ozone therapy →Use in treating COVID-19: Indicating who the therapists are, as I think User:CymHastings was trying to do. If this is too much information, feel free to remove it: it should be clear from the cited sources if people are interested.
- 14:3414:34, 27 April 2020 diff hist 0 m Ozone therapy →Use in treating COVID-19: Fix two spelling mistakes
- 14:3114:31, 27 April 2020 diff hist −80 Ozone therapy →Use in treating COVID-19: Removing some more WP:OR. They clearly have some empirical evidence, or at least SAY they do; and they believe the results are strong enough already to warrant urging other hospitals to follow suit.
- 14:2314:23, 27 April 2020 diff hist −178 Ozone therapy →Use in treating COVID-19: Remove some pure WP:OR not contained in the cited article.
- 14:2214:22, 27 April 2020 diff hist −6 Ozone therapy →Use in treating COVID-19: Not just alongside "traditional medicines", but the full conventional treatment.
- 14:2014:20, 27 April 2020 diff hist −34 Ozone therapy →Use in treating COVID-19: "Proponents" is vague and doesn't make clear that these were the people running the treatment; and "discredited" is a complex and arguable adjective that is best dealt with in its own sentence, or in the "Proposed uses" section above. If there is specific evidence to discredit these antiviral applications, it should be discussed, otherwise the sections above cover it sufficiently. And "claim" is a WP:WEASEL word.
- 14:0014:00, 27 April 2020 diff hist −231 Ozone therapy →Use in treating COVID-19: Removing WP:OR attempting to tie this treatment to an unrelated failed treatment. Some of these trials certainly did gain "credence by established public health authorities", enough to gain ethics committee support for at least one randomized controlled trial that I can find: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04359303?term=ozone&cond=covid-19&draw=2&rank=1, and the Italian Higher Institute of Health (ISS) gave its blessing, on condition of ethics approval.
- 13:4813:48, 27 April 2020 diff hist −13 Ozone therapy →Anecdotal claims in treating COVID-19: Changing section title back: These trials may be small and not include control groups, but they are not "anecdotal", and the word "claims" is a weasel word best avoided. The title could be changed, but should be accurate and avoid weasel words.
- 13:3813:38, 27 April 2020 diff hist +1,117 Ozone therapy →Proposed uses: Starting to add citations for proposed applications (many more could be added). Better representing what the Cancer Society said in cited webpage. Better representing what Saul Green said in cited article. Improved (but did not remove) the unreferenced statement about supportive evidence being limited -- would be nice if this had a supporting reference, as it is currently WP:OR.
- 12:3912:39, 27 April 2020 diff hist +342 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy: MS study: antioxidant and anti-inflammatory stimulation
- 12:2112:21, 27 April 2020 diff hist +326 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy: Herpes zoster study
- 12:1112:11, 27 April 2020 diff hist +126 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy: Another Hep B study
- 12:0612:06, 27 April 2020 diff hist +6 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy
- 12:0412:04, 27 April 2020 diff hist +180 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy: More detail on HIV trial
- 11:4711:47, 27 April 2020 diff hist +513 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy: Study on ozone in conjunction with antiretroviral treatment for HIV
- 11:2811:28, 27 April 2020 diff hist +252 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy: More on Hep C
- 11:1111:11, 27 April 2020 diff hist +691 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy: Adding a few more
- 10:3310:33, 27 April 2020 diff hist +1,043 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy: Some more evidence
- 06:1606:16, 27 April 2020 diff hist +902 Talk:Ozone therapy →Evidence of safety and efficacy: new section
18 April 2020
- 12:2612:26, 18 April 2020 diff hist +220 Ozone therapy →Safety: Add statement of Re and Rowen that they have conducted > 60000 major autohemotherapies without side effects.
- 12:1412:14, 18 April 2020 diff hist +52 Ozone therapy →Safety: The 5 deaths cited by Ernst in "A primer..." (which are in turn taken from Schmitt's 1982 dissertation "Zur Ozontherapie") are a subset of the 6 deaths and other serious incidents listed below, taken from Eisenmenger 1986 (who also drew from Schmitt). Merging these paragraphs.
