15:4415:44, 11 March 2019diffhist−19
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor
I respect the historiography, but it is certain that Carlos V obtained more power with the title of King of Spain and his Spanish global colonies that with the title of Emperor of the HRE. Changed to Habsburg Monarchy, the artificial term used by historiographers.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
14:3814:38, 11 March 2019diffhist+5
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor
The Habsburg Empire does not exist as such, and there is no dedicated article about it. "Philip II of Spain" is a name that generates less ambiguity and is more recognizable.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
14:2014:20, 11 March 2019diffhist+1
World language
→Living world languages: I have not used Wikipedia articles as sources. I have used official sources of the Spanish State as a source. Specifically, the Cervantes Institute, which is widely used and obviously accepted by Wikipedia. Also in this article, French organizations of the French language have been used as sources. Stop distorting, accusing and distorting. Discuss in Talk by contributing official sources, please.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
13:5313:53, 11 March 2019diffhist+102
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor
The term of King can also be binding to be the holder of an Empire. In this case, King Carlos I was the owner of the Spanish Empire. Please, avoid disqualifications.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
13:1713:17, 11 March 2019diffhist−3
World language
→Living world languages: False affirmation. Instituto Cervantes is a reliable and widely used and recognized source in Wikipedia. And I have also given sources belonging to the European Union. With the French language, organizations promoting the French language such as "La Francophonie" are also used as a sourceTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
12:4512:45, 11 March 2019diffhist+1
World language
→Living world languages: You have not contributed any official source to argue your opinion. You have erased a consensus map unilaterally without consensus and you demand consensus from others. I have contributed sources from Cervantes Institute (Official source recognized in Wikipedia) and some (Not only my friend Edd) has agreed. Please, provide official sources and discuss in Talk.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
11:5211:52, 11 March 2019diffhist0
World language
→Living world languages: I have not assumed that L1 is the only important thing. The comparison between Spanish and Chinese has no place, Spanish is expanded in 5 continents. Please, provide official sources in the discussion to try to establish consensus as I have done. Thank you. (TW)Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
11:0811:08, 11 March 2019diffhist+1
World language
→Living world languages: It is not an Edit War. Official sources have been contributed, many threads have been discussed and some people have opined in favor. On the opposite side, nothing has been contributed. Therefore this must be the current status. You have unilaterally erased a map about the Spanish language without any consensus. Stop being hypocritical. Thank you.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
10:0210:02, 11 March 2019diffhist0
World language
→Living world languages: The sources used are not biased. They are official data provided by the largest organization of the Spanish language. In the absence of reliable sources with a ranking, the status should be the current one due to the presence of official sources.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
09:1509:15, 11 March 2019diffhist−84
Nanban trade
Removed. It generates confusion and is incorrect. They were not the only Europeans who came to Japan during this Japanese period.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
21:4821:48, 10 March 2019diffhist−84
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor
Organized. He was the owner of the Spanish Empire before the Holy Roman Empire. The Spanish Empire was no less important than the Holy Roman Empire, on the contrary.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit