22:4122:41, 13 December 2020diffhist−59
Imperative mandate
→History: Falsification unsupported by the sources. It was the revolutionary leaders that banned the traditional imperative mandate, in order to give the Assembly unrestrained power.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
21:1421:14, 6 September 2020diffhist+195
Common law
→Definitions: For the sake of honesty, the traditional view should be placed in “historical meanings” and not in “misconceptions”, since its historical importance among Law scholars is more prominent than the polemical restriction of that usage to laymen.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
04:0904:09, 28 April 2020diffhist−88
Sabbatarianism
Catholic doctrine is certainly not that Sunday observance is a matter of purely Church law, bur also of Divine law. I’m pretty certain it’s the same for the Eastern Orthodox.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
17:3717:37, 5 April 2020diffhist−147
Common law
→Definitions: For the sake of completeness and honesty, the content in “misconceptions and imprecise non-lawyer uses” should be moved to “historical meanings”, since the “ancient and unwritten custom” is the view that has been adopted by lawyers and scholars (including the most important theorists of the common law) for most of its history. There is no purpose in separating these two sections.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit